R v BOND [2016] NZHC 2561
Adopted a 14 year starting point for the sexual violation offending (band 3), applied a 12 month uplift for the 1995 abduction to address deterrence, granted a 15% reduction for a late guilty plea, resulting in a finite sentence of 12 years 9 months for the sexual violation charges; imposed a concurrent structure for other offences (3 years aggravated burglary, 2 years assault with a weapon, 3 years abduction) and imposed a minimum period of imprisonment of eight years; preventive detention declined because a lengthy finite sentence combined with the availability of extended supervision and the prospect of offence-specific treatment provided adequate protection for the community.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 2561
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Devon Charles Bond
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences / Sentencing Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Finite determinate sentence imposed; preventive detention declined; minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) imposed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Guilty Plea Discount, Minimum Period of Imprisonment (mpi), Preventive Detention Criteria, Recidivism Risk Assessment, Victim Impact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Devon Charles Bond
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences / Sentencing Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate starting point for rape/sexual violation sentencing under R v AM
- 2 Whether to impose preventive detention
- 3 Whether to impose a minimum period of imprisonment (MPI)
Ratio Decidendi
Adopted a 14 year starting point for the sexual violation offending (band 3), applied a 12 month uplift for the 1995 abduction to address deterrence, granted a 15% reduction for a late guilty plea, resulting in a finite sentence of 12 years 9 months for the sexual violation charges; imposed a concurrent structure for other offences (3 years aggravated burglary, 2 years assault with a weapon, 3 years abduction) and imposed a minimum period of imprisonment of eight years; preventive detention declined because a lengthy finite sentence combined with the availability of extended supervision and the prospect of offence-specific treatment provided adequate protection for the community.
Court Disposition
Finite determinate sentence imposed; preventive detention declined; minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) imposed
Orders
- On three charges of sexual violation (including rape): 12 years 9 months imprisonment with a minimum period of imprisonment of 8 years (MPI)
- Aggravated burglary: 3 years imprisonment (concurrent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment