INTERNET TRADERS LIMITED & ORS v WILLIAMS & ORS [2015] NZHC 229

INTERNET TRADERS LIMITED & ORS v WILLIAMS & ORS [2015] NZHC 229

Adjournment was required because the amended statement of claim introducing the dividend/unjust enrichment allegation raises substantive partnership issues that realistically require further discovery and additional evidence, and the court could not have confidence the liability hearing could be completed in the five days allocated; therefore, in the interests of justice the trial date was adjourned.

Citation
[2015] NZHC 229
Parties
First Plaintiff: Internet Traders Limited; Second Plaintiff: IT Pharmaceutical Supplies Limited; Third Plaintiff: John Roulston Heale; First Defendant: Nicole Jean Williams; Second Defendant: Glencove (2014) Limited (formerly Casper47 Holdings Limited); Third Defendant: Tentacle Enterprises Limited; Fourth Defendant: Kiwipharma Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
20 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Shareholder/director Dispute and Unjust Enrichment / Pre Trial Adjournment Application; Liability Trial Listed to Commence 9 March 2015
Outcome
Adjournment granted
Legal Topics
Director Duties, Shareholder Agreement, Unjust Enrichment, Injunctive Relief, Discovery, Adjournment
Company Law Civil Procedure Equity Director Duties Shareholder Agreement Unjust Enrichment Injunctive Relief Discovery +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Internet Traders Limited

First Plaintiff

IT Pharmaceutical Supplies Limited

Second Plaintiff

John Roulston Heale

Third Plaintiff

Nicole Jean Williams

First Defendant

Glencove (2014) Limited (formerly Casper47 Holdings Limited)

Second Defendant

Tentacle Enterprises Limited

Third Defendant

Kiwipharma Limited

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Shareholder/director Dispute and Unjust Enrichment / Pre Trial Adjournment Application; Liability Trial Listed to Commence 9 March 2015

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial listed for 9 March 2015 should be adjourned in the interests of justice
  2. 2 Whether recent amendments to the statement of claim (including a dividend/unjust enrichment claim) require further discovery
  3. 3 Whether the allocated five days is adequate for the liability hearing

Ratio Decidendi

Adjournment was required because the amended statement of claim introducing the dividend/unjust enrichment allegation raises substantive partnership issues that realistically require further discovery and additional evidence, and the court could not have confidence the liability hearing could be completed in the five days allocated; therefore, in the interests of justice the trial date was adjourned.

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted

Orders

  • Hearing scheduled to commence 9 March 2015 is adjourned
  • Parties to organise a new date for the hearing with the Registrar