N-TECH LIMITED AND ORS V ABOOTH LIMITED (IN REC.) AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2006-404-003362
The court held that discovery of documents relating to the retainer and advice provided by Russell McVeagh was necessary and relevant to the determination of Russell McVeagh's summary judgment and strike-out applications; Gosling Chapman and Russell McVeagh must file and serve lists of such documents claiming...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-9539e033_fbec_4f3f_9de5_a3b15a525022.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: N-TECH LIMITED; Second Plaintiff: ST LUCIA INVESTMENTS LIMITED; Third Plaintiff: TOTARA INVESTMENTS LIMITED; First Defendant: ABOOTH LIMITED (IN REC.); Second to One Hundred and Twenty First Defendants: OTHER DEFENDANTS AS SET OUT IN SCHEDULE ONE; Selected Defendants: LSL DIGI-TECH DEFENDANTS (eighth, 17th, 25th, 28th, 37th and 117th Defendants); First Third Parties (partners of Gosling Chapman): R J CHAPMAN, G D C WALKER, T F MCGRATH; Second Third Parties: M V RICHARDSON AND T J GOLDFINCH; Third Third Party: RUSSELL MCVEAGH; First Fourth Party: H C VINCENT; Second Fourth Parties: J M K BROWN AND P H CASTLE; Third Fourth Party: K A SCHWASS
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Interlocutory Applications Concerning Discovery, Privilege, Strike Out and Summary Judgment / Interim Judgment on Discovery Application (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Interlocutory discovery ordered; determination of summary judgment and strike-out applications deferred pending discovery and inspection of documents and further submissions
- Legal Topics
- Discovery Orders, Inspection of Privileged Documents, Summary Judgment Test, Strike Out Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N-TECH LIMITED
First Plaintiff
ST LUCIA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
TOTARA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Third Plaintiff
ABOOTH LIMITED (IN REC.)
First Defendant
OTHER DEFENDANTS AS SET OUT IN SCHEDULE ONE
Second to One Hundred and Twenty First Defendants
LSL DIGI-TECH DEFENDANTS (eighth, 17th, 25th, 28th, 37th and 117th Defendants)
Selected Defendants
R J CHAPMAN, G D C WALKER, T F MCGRATH
First Third Parties (partners of Gosling Chapman)
M V RICHARDSON AND T J GOLDFINCH
Second Third Parties
RUSSELL MCVEAGH
Third Third Party
H C VINCENT
First Fourth Party
J M K BROWN AND P H CASTLE
Second Fourth Parties
K A SCHWASS
Third Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Interlocutory Applications Concerning Discovery, Privilege, Strike Out and Summary Judgment / Interim Judgment on Discovery Application (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Gosling Chapman instructed Russell McVeagh to act for the Digi-Tech investors (including the LSL Digi-Tech defendants)
- 2 Whether documents relating to the retainer and advice by Russell McVeagh are discoverable despite claims of privilege
- 3 Whether summary judgment/strike-out applications should be decided before resolution of discovery and privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that discovery of documents relating to the retainer and advice provided by Russell McVeagh was necessary and relevant to the determination of Russell McVeagh's summary judgment and strike-out applications; Gosling Chapman and Russell McVeagh must file and serve lists of such documents claiming privilege where relevant, and the court will inspect privileged documents to decide the validity of privilege before ruling on the substantive interlocutory applications.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory discovery ordered; determination of summary judgment and strike-out applications deferred pending discovery and inspection of documents and further submissions
Orders
- Gosling Chapman and Russell McVeagh to make discovery of documents concerning or in connection with the retainer of Russell McVeagh relating to the Digi-Tech transactions and ensuing dealings, by filing and serving a list of such documents in accordance with r295 claiming privilege where relevant
- The lists of documents are to be filed and served by Friday 10 October
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment