F v D [2013] NZHC 2132

F v D [2013] NZHC 2132

Summary judgment was dismissed because there are genuine and material factual disputes about what assets were transferred and their value (particularly whether Taupo assets were included and whether substantial assets were missing), which affect whether the defendant is liable to pay the full $81,500; accordingly further factual investigation and proceedings are required. The defendant was granted leave to amend her notice of opposition as there was no prejudice to the plaintiff.

Citation
[2013] NZHC 2132
Parties
Plaintiff: F; Defendant: D
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
21 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment (relationship Property / Sale of Business) / Summary Judgment Hearing; Judgment Delivered
Outcome
summary judgment dismissed; leave to file amended notice of opposition granted; costs reserved; matter referred for possible judicial settlement conference and directed back to District Court if appropriate
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Set Aside Agreement, Sale and Purchase of Business, Asset Valuation, Amendment of Pleadings, Judicial Settlement Conference
Family Law Relationship Property Contract Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Set Aside Agreement Sale and Purchase of Business Asset Valuation +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

F

Plaintiff

D

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment (relationship Property / Sale of Business) / Summary Judgment Hearing; Judgment Delivered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendant is liable to pay $81,500 under the relationship property agreement
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment is appropriate given disputed facts about which business assets were transferred and their value
  3. 3 Whether issues about missing Taupo assets are matters between vendor and purchaser or affect the relationship property adjustment

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment was dismissed because there are genuine and material factual disputes about what assets were transferred and their value (particularly whether Taupo assets were included and whether substantial assets were missing), which affect whether the defendant is liable to pay the full $81,500; accordingly further factual investigation and proceedings are required. The defendant was granted leave to amend her notice of opposition as there was no prejudice to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

summary judgment dismissed; leave to file amended notice of opposition granted; costs reserved; matter referred for possible judicial settlement conference and directed back to District Court if appropriate

Orders

  • Summary judgment application dismissed
  • Leave granted to file the amended notice of opposition and supporting affidavit