AL-DERZI v AL-DERZI [2019] NZHC 1626

AL-DERZI v AL-DERZI [2019] NZHC 1626

Substituted service as ordered was effective, no statement of defence was filed within the prescribed period, and the plaintiff's verified affidavit and supporting evidence established entitlement to the specified liquidated sum under s 185(1)(f), entitling the plaintiff to default judgment for that sum and accrued...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] NZHC 1626
Parties
Plaintiff: Fayha Jassim Al-Derzi; Defendant: Faris Al-Derzi
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
12 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Property Dispute (distribution of Mortgagee Sale Surplus) / Application for Default Judgment (on the Papers)
Outcome
Default judgment entered for the plaintiff for recovery of the surplus proceeds and accrued interest under s 185(1)(f) Property Law Act 2007.
Legal Topics
Mortgagee Sale Surplus, Default Judgment, Substituted Service, S185(1)(f) Property Law Act 2007
Property Law Civil Procedure Mortgagee Sale Surplus Default Judgment Substituted Service S185(1)(f) Property Law Act 2007

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fayha Jassim Al-Derzi

Plaintiff

Faris Al-Derzi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Property Dispute (distribution of Mortgagee Sale Surplus) / Application for Default Judgment (on the Papers)

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the surplus sale proceeds under s 185(1)(f) Property Law Act 2007
  2. 2 Whether substituted service by email and Facebook Messenger was valid
  3. 3 Whether default judgment is appropriate where no statement of defence was filed

Ratio Decidendi

Substituted service as ordered was effective, no statement of defence was filed within the prescribed period, and the plaintiff's verified affidavit and supporting evidence established entitlement to the specified liquidated sum under s 185(1)(f), entitling the plaintiff to default judgment for that sum and accrued interest against the holder of the surplus proceeds.

Court Disposition

Default judgment entered for the plaintiff for recovery of the surplus proceeds and accrued interest under s 185(1)(f) Property Law Act 2007.

Orders

  • Judgment that the plaintiff recover under s 185(1)(f) of the Property Law Act 2007 the sum of $752,758.01 and all or any accrued interest on it from the mortgagee of the property of 130 Coronation Road, Hillcrest, Auckland, or any other person that currently holds the surplus sale proceeds from the mortgagee sale of...
  • No order for costs and disbursements against the defendant (plaintiff does not seek costs).