R v WALMSLEY [2016] NZHC 1407
After assessing culpability (planning, vulnerability of victims, scale, breach of trust) and applying R v AM bands, the judge set an adjusted total effective sentence of 22 years' imprisonment with a minimum period of 10 years; starting points used were 16 years for the CYFS rapes and 15 years for the Smith sisters' rapes then scaled back for totality to 22 years; no discount for good character was allowed.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1407
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Frank Russell Walmsley
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offending / Sentencing (post Conviction)
- Outcome
- Convicted on 52 charges; sentenced to total effective 22 years' imprisonment to be served concurrently with a minimum period of imprisonment of 10 years.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection, Minimum Period of Imprisonment, Totality Principle, Breach of Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Frank Russell Walmsley
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offending / Sentencing (post Conviction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate starting point for multiple serious sexual offences
- 2 Application of totality to multiple groups of offences
- 3 Whether a minimum period under s86 is required
Ratio Decidendi
After assessing culpability (planning, vulnerability of victims, scale, breach of trust) and applying R v AM bands, the judge set an adjusted total effective sentence of 22 years' imprisonment with a minimum period of 10 years; starting points used were 16 years for the CYFS rapes and 15 years for the Smith sisters' rapes then scaled back for totality to 22 years; no discount for good character was allowed.
Court Disposition
Convicted on 52 charges; sentenced to total effective 22 years' imprisonment to be served concurrently with a minimum period of imprisonment of 10 years.
Orders
- 13 counts of sexual violation by rape: 22 years' imprisonment on each (charges 10,12,13,14,16,22,31,46,48,50,75,77,94) concurrent
- 14 counts of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection: 16 years' imprisonment on each concurrent (charges 3,7,8,18,20,27,35,51,53,56,58,83,96,98)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment