GRANT AND ORS v GOLDENCOURT INVESTMENTS LIMITED [2014] NZHC 2109
Indemnity costs were refused because the plaintiffs' conduct did not meet the high threshold of flagrant or exceptionally bad behaviour; however, the plaintiffs conceded the set aside application on the eve of hearing and the circumstances (including personal undertakings by liquidators and inability to secure costs) justified an award of scale costs of $13,134 and disbursements of $3,260 to LY, to be paid by the second plaintiff and the liquidators personally (subject to any company indemnity).
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 2109
- Parties
- First Plaintiff Liquidator of Hunter Gills Road Limited (in Liquidation): Damien Mitchell Grant; First Plaintiff Liquidator of Hunter Gills Road Limited (in Liquidation): John Michael Gilbert; Second Plaintiff: Gills Road Village Limited; First Defendant: Goldencourt Investments Limited; Second Defendant: LY Investment (No 1) Limited as trustee of the LY Investment (No 1) Trust; Third Defendant: Marmande Property Investment Limited; Fourth Defendant: 125 Gills Limited; Fifth Defendant: 125 Gills Road Limited Partnership
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Freezing Order and Related Claims Under Property Law Act and Partnership Disputes / Application to Set Aside Freezing Order Determined on the Papers With Costs Decision
- Outcome
- Indemnity costs denied; scale costs and disbursements awarded to second defendant (LY); costs payable by second plaintiff and liquidators personally subject to any company indemnity.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Order, Set Aside Application, Indemnity Costs, Liquidator Personal Liability, Mortgagee Sale, Property Law Act Ss 176 and 185, Undertaking as to Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damien Mitchell Grant
First Plaintiff Liquidator of Hunter Gills Road Limited (in Liquidation)
John Michael Gilbert
First Plaintiff Liquidator of Hunter Gills Road Limited (in Liquidation)
Gills Road Village Limited
Second Plaintiff
Goldencourt Investments Limited
First Defendant
LY Investment (No 1) Limited as trustee of the LY Investment (No 1) Trust
Second Defendant
Marmande Property Investment Limited
Third Defendant
125 Gills Limited
Fourth Defendant
125 Gills Road Limited Partnership
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Freezing Order and Related Claims Under Property Law Act and Partnership Disputes / Application to Set Aside Freezing Order Determined on the Papers With Costs Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs under r 14.6(4)(a) should be awarded to the second defendant (LY) against the plaintiffs
- 2 Whether plaintiffs acted improperly, unnecessarily or in flagrant misconduct justifying indemnity costs
- 3 Whether scale costs and disbursements are appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Indemnity costs were refused because the plaintiffs' conduct did not meet the high threshold of flagrant or exceptionally bad behaviour; however, the plaintiffs conceded the set aside application on the eve of hearing and the circumstances (including personal undertakings by liquidators and inability to secure costs) justified an award of scale costs of $13,134 and disbursements of $3,260 to LY, to be paid by the second plaintiff and the liquidators personally (subject to any company indemnity).
Court Disposition
Indemnity costs denied; scale costs and disbursements awarded to second defendant (LY); costs payable by second plaintiff and liquidators personally subject to any company indemnity.
Orders
- LY Investment (No 1) Limited is awarded costs on a scale basis in the sum of NZD 13,134 payable by Gills Road Village Limited (second plaintiff) and by the liquidators Damien Mitchell Grant and John Michael Gilbert personally
- LY Investment (No 1) Limited is awarded disbursements in the sum of NZD 3,260 payable by Gills Road Village Limited (second plaintiff) and by the liquidators Damien Mitchell Grant and John Michael Gilbert personally
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment