ROBINS v CARTWRIGHT [2022] NZHC 868

ROBINS v CARTWRIGHT [2022] NZHC 868

Defendant's asserted misrepresentation and breach claims lacked any evidential foundation supporting quantum of loss; absent such evidence there was no arguable defence or set-off to the undisputed arrears. Summary judgment was therefore granted for the unpaid instalments and interest, while the plaintiff's claim...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] NZHC 868
Parties
Plaintiff: Gareth John Robins; Defendant: Benjamin Edward Cartwright
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
29 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application (debt for Purchase Price) / Hearing and Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment
Outcome
Summary judgment entered in part for the plaintiff for arrears and interest; summary judgment refused for claim for future instalments/damages
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Set Off, Cancellation, Interest
Contract Law Civil Procedure Commercial Sale of Business Remedies (damages and Set Off) Summary Judgment Misrepresentation Breach of Contract Set Off +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gareth John Robins

Plaintiff

Benjamin Edward Cartwright

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application (debt for Purchase Price) / Hearing and Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendant has an arguable defence to the claim for unpaid instalments
  2. 2 Whether defendant's counterclaim for misrepresentation and breach provides an evidentially supported set-off sufficient to defeat summary judgment
  3. 3 Whether claim for future instalments (damages) is appropriate for summary judgment given no cancellation of the contract

Ratio Decidendi

Defendant's asserted misrepresentation and breach claims lacked any evidential foundation supporting quantum of loss; absent such evidence there was no arguable defence or set-off to the undisputed arrears. Summary judgment was therefore granted for the unpaid instalments and interest, while the plaintiff's claim for future instalments (damages) was unsuitable for summary judgment because the Agreement had not been cancelled.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment entered in part for the plaintiff for arrears and interest; summary judgment refused for claim for future instalments/damages

Orders

  • Judgment against defendant Benjamin Edward Cartwright for unpaid instalments $430,650.00 NZD
  • Interest payable under the Agreement $87,531.58 NZD