WILLIAMS & ANOR V THE HOUSE COMPANY (WHANGAREI) LIMITED & ORS HC WHA CIV 2004-088-657
The judgment sealed on 7 December 2006 was irregularly obtained because the claimed repair damages required proof and assessment under r 463 and thus were not a clear liquidated demand for the purposes of r 460; an irregularly obtained judgment must be set aside under r 469 and r 463, and accordingly the default judgment against the tenth defendant is set aside without conditions and without an order for costs.
- Citation
- openlaw-bffed730_f772_4d69_a2f5_18d9ba34d909.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gavin Hamilton Williams; Plaintiff: Barbara Jane Williams; Defendant (first): The House Company (Whangarei) Limited; Defendant (second): The House Company (Whangarei 2003) Limited; Defendant (third): Owen Davies; Defendant (fourth): Ross Cannon; Defendant (fifth): Wayne Sapwell; Defendant (sixth): Paul van der Sluis; Defendant (seventh): Barry Chappell; Defendant (eighth): Terrence O'Connor; Defendant (ninth): The Whangarei District Council; Defendant (tenth): Anthony Orville Amundson; Defendant (eleventh): Matt Crum
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Negligence / Building Defect / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (r 469)
- Outcome
- Default judgment entered 7 December 2006 against tenth defendant set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Liquidated Demand, Assessment of Damages, High Court Rules Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gavin Hamilton Williams
Plaintiff
Barbara Jane Williams
Plaintiff
The House Company (Whangarei) Limited
Defendant (first)
The House Company (Whangarei 2003) Limited
Defendant (second)
Owen Davies
Defendant (third)
Ross Cannon
Defendant (fourth)
Wayne Sapwell
Defendant (fifth)
Paul van der Sluis
Defendant (sixth)
Barry Chappell
Defendant (seventh)
Terrence O'Connor
Defendant (eighth)
The Whangarei District Council
Defendant (ninth)
Anthony Orville Amundson
Defendant (tenth)
Matt Crum
Defendant (eleventh)
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence / Building Defect / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (r 469)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's claim for $10,000 constituted a liquidated demand
- 2 Whether a hearing under r 463 was required to assess damages before sealing judgment
- 3 Whether the default judgment was irregularly obtained and should be set aside under r 469
Ratio Decidendi
The judgment sealed on 7 December 2006 was irregularly obtained because the claimed repair damages required proof and assessment under r 463 and thus were not a clear liquidated demand for the purposes of r 460; an irregularly obtained judgment must be set aside under r 469 and r 463, and accordingly the default judgment against the tenth defendant is set aside without conditions and without an order for costs.
Court Disposition
Default judgment entered 7 December 2006 against tenth defendant set aside.
Orders
- Order setting aside judgment entered 7 December 2006 against the tenth defendant (Anthony Orville Amundson).
- No order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment