RE GREENPEACE OF NEW ZEALAND INC SC 97/2012
Leave to appeal was granted to determine whether the Court of Appeal's views in paragraphs [55]–[68] and [96]–[97] were correct; the Supreme Court did not decide the substantive issues but permitted an appeal limited to that question.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- SC 97/2012
- Parties
- Applicant: Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc; Respondent: Charities Board
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 8 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Charities Law Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted by Supreme Court on 8 March 2013
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted by the Supreme Court
- Legal Topics
- Charitable Status, Public Benefit, Appeal on Point of Law, Leave to Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc
Applicant
Charities Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Charities Law Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted by Supreme Court on 8 March 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal correctly interpreted the law on charitable status and public benefit in its reasons at [55]–[68] and [96]–[97]
- 2 Whether there is sufficient legal importance or arguable error to justify grant of leave to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted to determine whether the Court of Appeal's views in paragraphs [55]–[68] and [96]–[97] were correct; the Supreme Court did not decide the substantive issues but permitted an appeal limited to that question.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted by the Supreme Court
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted to consider whether the Court of Appeal's views in [55]–[68] and [96]–[97] were correct
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
RE GREENPEACE OF NEW ZEALAND INC SC 97/2012 [8 March 2013]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALANDSC 97/2012[2013] NZSC 12BETWEEN RE GREENPEACE OF NEW ZEALANDINCApplicantCourt: Elias CJ, Chambers and Glazebrook JJCounsel: D M Salmon and D Currie for ApplicantP J Gunn for the Charities BoardJudgment: 8 March 2013JUDGMENT OF THE COURTLeave to appeal is granted on the following ground:Were the views expressed by the Court of Appeal in its judgment [2012] NZCA 533 at [55]–[68] and [96]–[97] of its reasons correct?Solicitors:Lee Salmon Long, Auckland, for ApplicantCrown Law Office, Wellington, for the Charities Board