GREENSHELL NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) v KENNEDY BAY MUSSEL COMPANY (NZ) LIMITED [2015] NZSC 180

GREENSHELL NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) v KENNEDY BAY MUSSEL COMPANY (NZ) LIMITED [2015] NZSC 180

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and cross-appeal and identified the two substantive issues for determination: jurisdiction to grant relief against forfeiture and, if jurisdiction exists, whether relief should have been granted by the Court of Appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NZSC 180
Parties
Applicant: Greenshell New Zealand Limited (In Receivership); Respondent: Kennedy Bay Mussel Company (NZ) Limited
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
24 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal and Cross Appeal Granted
Outcome
Leave to appeal and leave to cross-appeal granted; substantive issues certified for hearing
Legal Topics
Forfeiture, Relief Against Forfeiture, Lease, Sub Licence, Jurisdiction to Grant Relief
Property Equity Contract Administrative/procedural Forfeiture Relief Against Forfeiture Lease Sub Licence +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Greenshell New Zealand Limited (In Receivership)

Applicant

Kennedy Bay Mussel Company (NZ) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal and Cross Appeal Granted

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to grant relief against forfeiture of rights under the deed of lease and deed of sub-licence
  2. 2 If jurisdiction existed, whether the Court of Appeal erred in declining to grant such relief

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and cross-appeal and identified the two substantive issues for determination: jurisdiction to grant relief against forfeiture and, if jurisdiction exists, whether relief should have been granted by the Court of Appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal and leave to cross-appeal granted; substantive issues certified for hearing

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Leave to cross-appeal granted