HIH INSURANCE HOLDINGS (NZ) LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) V HIH CASUALTY AND GENERAL INSURANCE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) HC AK CIV 2001-404-004097
Given the unusual but commercially successful administration of the liquidation—payment of full dividends on accepted claims, maintenance of required reserves, and improved prospects for creditors—the court concluded the proposed hourly rates were appropriate and approved them from 1 April 2008 while reserving the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-d4537000_c85c_4679_b084_858b66692eab.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff: HIH INSURANCE HOLDINGS (NZ) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION); Defendant: HIH CASUALTY AND GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Act 1993 S 284(1) Application for Approval of Liquidators' Remuneration / Judgment on Application (approval of Rates)
- Outcome
- Approved liquidators' rates of remuneration from 1 April 2008
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Remuneration, Court Approval of Fees, Liquidation Scheme, Dividend Distribution
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HIH INSURANCE HOLDINGS (NZ) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Plaintiff
HIH CASUALTY AND GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Companies Act 1993 S 284(1) Application for Approval of Liquidators' Remuneration / Judgment on Application (approval of Rates)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should approve the liquidators' proposed hourly rates under s 284(1) Companies Act 1993
- 2 Whether the application needed service on all shareholders and creditors potentially affected
- 3 Whether the rates are appropriate given the duration and performance of the liquidation
Ratio Decidendi
Given the unusual but commercially successful administration of the liquidation—payment of full dividends on accepted claims, maintenance of required reserves, and improved prospects for creditors—the court concluded the proposed hourly rates were appropriate and approved them from 1 April 2008 while reserving the court's overriding power to review final remuneration on approval of accounts.
Court Disposition
Approved liquidators' rates of remuneration from 1 April 2008
Orders
- Approve rates of remuneration from 1 April 2008: Partners $575 p/h
- Directors $500 p/h
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
HIH INSURANCE HOLDINGS (NZ) LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) V HIH CASUALTY AND GENERAL INSURANCE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) HC AK CIV 2001-404-004097 17 July 2008IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV 2001-404-004097UNDER The Companies Act 1993 BETWEEN HIH INSURANCE HOLDINGS (NZ) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Plaintiff AND HIH CASUALTY AND GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Defendant Hearing: 16 July 2008 Counsel: M V Robinson for Liquidators Judgment: 17 July 2008 at 2:00pmJUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE ROBINSON [Approving remuneration of liquidators]This judgment was delivered by me on 17 July 2008 at 200pm, pursuant to Rule 540(4) of the High Court Rules. Registrar/Deputy Registrar DateSolicitors: Simpson Grierson, Private Bag 92518, Auckland[1] The liquidators seek approval of rates of remuneration from 1 April 2008 under s 284 (1) Companies Act 1993. For reasons set forth in the Minute I issued on 27 June 2008 I invited further submissions on whether the application of the liquidator for approval of the rates of remuneration should be served on other interested parties including shareholders or creditors who could be adversely affected by such an order. I was also concerned at the time taken to conclude the liquidation, the company having being placed into liquidation in July 2001. [2] Counsel for the liquidator has supplied a very helpful memorandum. Counsel has attached to the memorandum a chart listing all the companies involved in the HIH Insurance Group collapse. It is submitted by counsel for the liquidators that unnecessary costs would incurred in involving all the shareholders and creditors of all upstream companies in this application. Such increase in administrative costs would come without any additional benefit. [3] Counsel also advise that the liquidators expect to file an application for appropriate directions for a liquidation scheme to bring this liquidation to an end within six months. On receipt of an order approving the scheme the liquidators expect a period of approximately 12 to 18 months to communicate with policyholders and allow time for receipt and adjudication of claims. [4] This has been a most unusual liquidation. It has been commercially successful. The liquidators have paid dividends amounting to 100 cents in the dollar on accepted claims while maintaining adequate reserves of funds to comply with a court order of 28 November 2003. The court order of 28 November 2003 requires the liquidators to retain a sum of $35,000,000 on for outstanding claims. According to the latest financial report balance of funds on hand as at 19 January 2008 amount to $58,881,420. The liquidator estimates that note holders in HIH Holdings who at the time of liquidation were expected to be paid 9 cents in the dollar are now likely to receive 22 cents in the dollar. [5] Having regard to the unusual aspect of this liquidation and the fact that the liquidators have been very successful in the way in which they have carried out this liquidation, I am satisfied that it is appropriate to approve their rates of remunerationin accordance with the application they filed. Consequently from 1 April 2008 I approve the following rates of remuneration: a) Partners $575 p/h b) Directors $500 p/h c) Consultants $500 p/h d) Associate Directors $450 p/h e) Senior Managers $400 p/h f) Manager $350 p/h g) Assistant Managers $300 p/h h) Senior Analysts $270 p/h i) Analysts $230 p/h j) Secretarial/administration $150 p/h [6] These rates of remuneration are approved to subject to the overriding power of the court to review the amount to be paid to the liquidators on final approval of the accounts. ____________________ M D Robinson Associate Judge