R v CHASE [2017] NZHC 244
The appropriate starting point for the lead rape convictions was 16 years (band four of R v AM); uplift of 2.5 years for totality of long‑term, repeated violent offending produced an overall determinate sentence of 18 years and 6 months; preventive detention was not imposed because a lengthy determinate sentence together with parole supervision and the prospect of a future extended supervision order provided sufficient community protection; a 50% minimum period (nine years and three months) was imposed because the normal one‑third minimum was inadequate given lack of remorse, ongoing risk and gravity of harm.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 244
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Hoani John Chase; Complainant: Complainant (name suppressed)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Hearing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to determinate imprisonment of 18 years and 6 months with a minimum period of imprisonment of 9 years and 3 months; preventive detention declined; publication of complainant identifying particulars prohibited under s203 Criminal Procedure Act 2011.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Preventive Detention, Minimum Period of Imprisonment, Totality Principle, Victim Impact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Hoani John Chase
Defendant
Complainant (name suppressed)
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate starting point for multiple counts of rape within R v AM band four
- 2 Whether to impose preventive detention under Sentencing Act s87
- 3 Appropriate uplift for totality to reflect multiple other violent offences over 16 years
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate starting point for the lead rape convictions was 16 years (band four of R v AM); uplift of 2.5 years for totality of long‑term, repeated violent offending produced an overall determinate sentence of 18 years and 6 months; preventive detention was not imposed because a lengthy determinate sentence together with parole supervision and the prospect of a future extended supervision order provided sufficient community protection; a 50% minimum period (nine years and three months) was imposed because the normal one‑third minimum was inadequate given lack of remorse, ongoing risk and gravity of harm.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to determinate imprisonment of 18 years and 6 months with a minimum period of imprisonment of 9 years and 3 months; preventive detention declined; publication of complainant identifying particulars prohibited under s203 Criminal Procedure Act 2011.
Orders
- Sexual violation by rape (charges 7,15,16,17,29,32): 18 years 6 months imprisonment each, minimum period 9 years 3 months each
- Threatening to kill (charges 9,10,13,14,26,27): 2 years imprisonment each
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment