HARPER v BEAMISH HC NAP CIV-2009-441-000636
Indemnity costs and any uplift were refused because plaintiffs, although unsuccessful, did not act vexatiously or so unreasonably as to attract indemnity costs or an uplift; plaintiffs had professional advice and a genuine but ultimately misguided belief in their claim. Costs awarded to defendants on Category 2B scale totaling $28,460; selected disbursements allowed and a reduced witness fee of $600 awarded for Mr Edwards.
- Citation
- openlaw-50ac5921_aeff_4fc2_b1db_470d653f4c03.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Melanie Joy Harper; Second Plaintiff: Clair Fiona Macintyre; Third Plaintiffs: Clair Fiona Macintyre and Arthur Jack Smithwick Harper as trustees of the C F Engel Trust; Defendants: Dorothy Joy Beamish, Simon Noel Beamish and Graham Cameron Edwards as trustees of the Awapai Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (trust Dispute) / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Indemnity costs and an uplift were refused. Costs awarded to defendants on Category 2B scale totalling $28,460. Approved disbursements: S J Scannell & Co $321.80 (less GST), Mr Edwards printing/copying/mileage/tolls $92, plus an approved witness fee of $600. No further costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Costs on Scale (category 2 B), Witness Expenses / Disbursements, High Court Rules R 14.6 and R 14.12
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Melanie Joy Harper
First Plaintiff
Clair Fiona Macintyre
Second Plaintiff
Clair Fiona Macintyre and Arthur Jack Smithwick Harper as trustees of the C F Engel Trust
Third Plaintiffs
Dorothy Joy Beamish, Simon Noel Beamish and Graham Cameron Edwards as trustees of the Awapai Trust
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil (trust Dispute) / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded under r 14.6(4)(a)
- 2 Whether an uplift (50%) above scale costs should be awarded under r 14.6(3)
- 3 Whether claimed witness fees/disbursements are reasonable under r 14.12
Ratio Decidendi
Indemnity costs and any uplift were refused because plaintiffs, although unsuccessful, did not act vexatiously or so unreasonably as to attract indemnity costs or an uplift; plaintiffs had professional advice and a genuine but ultimately misguided belief in their claim. Costs awarded to defendants on Category 2B scale totaling $28,460; selected disbursements allowed and a reduced witness fee of $600 awarded for Mr Edwards.
Court Disposition
Indemnity costs and an uplift were refused. Costs awarded to defendants on Category 2B scale totalling $28,460. Approved disbursements: S J Scannell & Co $321.80 (less GST), Mr Edwards printing/copying/mileage/tolls $92, plus an approved witness fee of $600. No further costs ordered.
Orders
- Costs awarded to defendants on Category 2B basis totalling NZD 28,460
- Indemnity costs for the post-5 September 2011 period declined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment