RE MERONA TRUSTEES LIMITED (M & R COOPER NO.2 TRUST) [2021] NZHC 2095
The court ordered service on the named adult beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries who are undoubtedly affected because they must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard; the court exercised its discretion to dispense with service on the children of Lillian, Miffy and Raymond because their interests are likely aligned with their parents and on Wendy because as a life interest beneficiary with no entitlement to capital and no residency in trust property her interests are unlikely to be affected.
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 2095
- Parties
- Applicant/trustee: Merona Trustees Limited; Applicant/trustee: Hamish Patrick Bennett; Settlor (deceased): Mervyn Nathaniel Cooper; Settlor (deceased): Sylvia Rona Lorraine Cooper; Beneficiary: Lillian Jessica Cooper; Beneficiary: Miffy Amanda Dasilva; Beneficiary (deceased): Robert William Cooper; Potential Beneficiary: Raymond Alan Moody; Life Interest Beneficiary: Wendy Elizabeth Halliday; Potential Beneficiary/spouse: Suzanne (Robert's wife); Potential Beneficiaries (class): Children of Robert
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Trusts Act S133 Application / Application for Directions as to Service (on the Papers)
- Outcome
- Application for directions as to service granted in part; orders made for service on specified beneficiaries and dispensation of service for certain others; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Trust Deed, Service of Proceedings, Beneficiary Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merona Trustees Limited
Applicant/trustee
Hamish Patrick Bennett
Applicant/trustee
Mervyn Nathaniel Cooper
Settlor (deceased)
Sylvia Rona Lorraine Cooper
Settlor (deceased)
Lillian Jessica Cooper
Beneficiary
Miffy Amanda Dasilva
Beneficiary
Robert William Cooper
Beneficiary (deceased)
Raymond Alan Moody
Potential Beneficiary
Wendy Elizabeth Halliday
Life Interest Beneficiary
Suzanne (Robert's wife)
Potential Beneficiary/spouse
Children of Robert
Potential Beneficiaries (class)
Procedural Posture
Trusts Act S133 Application / Application for Directions as to Service (on the Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether phrase 'any of the children of the Settlors' means children of both settlors jointly or of either settlor individually
- 2 Which beneficiaries must be served with the application and whether service may be dispensed with for others
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered service on the named adult beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries who are undoubtedly affected because they must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard; the court exercised its discretion to dispense with service on the children of Lillian, Miffy and Raymond because their interests are likely aligned with their parents and on Wendy because as a life interest beneficiary with no entitlement to capital and no residency in trust property her interests are unlikely to be affected.
Court Disposition
Application for directions as to service granted in part; orders made for service on specified beneficiaries and dispensation of service for certain others; costs reserved.
Orders
- Proceeding to be served on Lillian Jessica Cooper
- Proceeding to be served on Miffy Amanda Dasilva
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment