Bagnall v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Bagnall v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Because the hearing notice was sent to the appellant's correct address and the appellant failed to appear by the appointed time, the court struck out the appeal for want of prosecution.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] NZACC 102
Parties
Appellant: James Bagnall; Respondent: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
22 May 1997
Procedural Posture
Appeal Pursuant to Section 91 of the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992 / Hearing Listed; Appeal Struck Out for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Appeal struck out for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Appeal, Strike Out, Service of Notice, Want of Prosecution
Administrative Law Accident Compensation Civil Procedure Appeal Strike Out Service of Notice Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Bagnall

Appellant

Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Pursuant to Section 91 of the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992 / Hearing Listed; Appeal Struck Out for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether appellant's failure to appear warranted striking out the appeal for want of prosecution
  2. 2 Whether the notice of hearing was properly sent to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

Because the hearing notice was sent to the appellant's correct address and the appellant failed to appear by the appointed time, the court struck out the appeal for want of prosecution.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out for want of prosecution

Orders

  • Appeal struck out for want of prosecution