PARLANE V WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL CA CA319/05

PARLANE V WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL CA CA319/05

Special leave to appeal was granted because the matter raised a question of law—whether the High Court correctly exercised s 7 severance powers in deleting clause 2(a)—which was of general and public importance and therefore suitable for determination by the Court of Appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
openlaw-5d525c43_dec1_4368_b975_362337ee4db8.pdf
Parties
Applicant: James Charles Morris Parlane; Respondent: Waipa District Council
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
7 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Special Leave to Appeal / Leave Granted
Outcome
Special leave to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Special Leave to Appeal, Severance of Bylaw Clause, Bylaws Act 1910 S7, Judicial Review of Bylaws
Administrative Law Local Government Law Bylaws Special Leave to Appeal Severance of Bylaw Clause Bylaws Act 1910 S7 Judicial Review of Bylaws

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Charles Morris Parlane

Applicant

Waipa District Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave to Appeal / Leave Granted

  1. 1 Whether the High Court Judge was correct to sever clause 2 of the bylaw by deleting clause 2(a) under s 7 of the Bylaws Act 1910

Ratio Decidendi

Special leave to appeal was granted because the matter raised a question of law—whether the High Court correctly exercised s 7 severance powers in deleting clause 2(a)—which was of general and public importance and therefore suitable for determination by the Court of Appeal.

Court Disposition

Special leave to appeal granted

Orders

  • Applicant to have $1,500 costs and usual disbursements on this application