R v WARREN [2017] NZHC 1465
Preventive detention was declined because the defendant demonstrated recent willingness to engage in treatment and a lengthy determinate sentence with a minimum non-parole period would adequately protect the public; the court set a starting point of six years for the sexual violation, uplifted two years for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 1465
- Parties
- Crown: The Queen; Defendant: Jason David Warren; Complainant: H
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Preventive Detention, Minimum Period of Imprisonment, Guilty Plea Discount, Totality Principle, Three Strikes Warning
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Crown
Jason David Warren
Defendant
H
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether preventive detention should be imposed
- 2 Proper starting point for sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection in intimate relationship
- 3 Appropriate uplift for associated violent offending and relevance of prior convictions
Ratio Decidendi
Preventive detention was declined because the defendant demonstrated recent willingness to engage in treatment and a lengthy determinate sentence with a minimum non-parole period would adequately protect the public; the court set a starting point of six years for the sexual violation, uplifted two years for associated kidnapping and assaults and one year for prior domestic violence, applied a 20% plea discount, resulting in an effective sentence of seven years two months' imprisonment with a minimum period of four years to be served, all sentences concurrent.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection: 7 years 2 months imprisonment
- Kidnapping: 2 years imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment