WALLACE v R SC 99/2011
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant's submissions failed to meet the established criteria for granting leave to appeal for bail pending appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- SC 99/2011
- Parties
- Applicant: Jay Maui Wallace; Respondent: The Queen
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Pending Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Bail Pending Appeal, Criteria for Leave
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jay Maui Wallace
Applicant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Pending Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted for bail pending appeal against conviction and sentence
- 2 Whether the applicant met the criteria for leave to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant's submissions failed to meet the established criteria for granting leave to appeal for bail pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
WALLACE v R SC 99/2011 18 October 2011IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALANDSC 99/2011[2011] NZSC 126JAY MAUI WALLACEvTHE QUEENCourt: Elias CJ, Blanchard and William Young JJCounsel: Applicant in PersonJ E Mildenhall for CrownJudgment: 18 October 2011JUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe application for leave to appeal is dismissed.REASONS[1] The applicant seeks leave to appeal against a refusal by a Court of Appeal Judge to grant him bail1 pending his appeal to that Court against conviction and sentence on charges involving violence and firearms. His submissions provide no basis for a further bail appeal. The criteria for leave are not met.Solicitors:Crown Law Office, Wellington1 Wallace v R [2011] NZCA 424.