HENDERSON v R [2016] NZCA 394

HENDERSON v R [2016] NZCA 394

Leave to appeal was granted because arguable issues existed, but on full consideration the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed; publication prohibition ordered to protect the fairness of ongoing proceedings.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] NZCA 394
Parties
Appellant: JOHN PERRY MORGAN HENDERSON; Respondent: THE QUEEN
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
10 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave Application and Substantive Appeal Determined
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; publication prohibition ordered
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Appeal Dismissal, Publication Prohibition, Reporting Restrictions
Criminal Law Appeals Publication Law Suppression Orders Leave to Appeal Appeal Dismissal Publication Prohibition Reporting Restrictions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JOHN PERRY MORGAN HENDERSON

Appellant

THE QUEEN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Leave Application and Substantive Appeal Determined

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the grounds of appeal succeed on the merits
  3. 3 Whether a publication prohibition should be imposed or continued to protect trial fairness

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted because arguable issues existed, but on full consideration the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed; publication prohibition ordered to protect the fairness of ongoing proceedings.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; publication prohibition ordered

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal is granted.
  • The appeal is dismissed.