RABBITT V RABBITT HC WN CIV-2012-485-002126
Where a testator shows a general charitable intention directed to a specific charitable cause but refers to an organisation that is not the appropriate contemporary vehicle, the Court may, having ensured statutory advertising and an Attorney-General report, vary the will under ss32-33 to substitute a suitable charity (here Hutt Hospital Foundation) to carry out the charitable purpose (education and training of community/district nurses). The statutory prerequisites were satisfied and variation was appropriate.
- Citation
- openlaw-52bfce44_432a_424f_bdbe_51cae3ee0052.pdf
- Parties
- Applicant: John William Rabbitt; First Respondent: Dorothy Rabbitt; Second Respondent: Attorney-General
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Charitable Trusts Variation and Correction of Will / Originating Application Under High Court Rules R19.5 and S32/s33 Charitable Trusts Act; Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted. Variation of the will approved and correction permitted; costs awarded as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Charitable Trusts, Cy Près, Correction of Will, Public Benefit, Charitable Purpose Validation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John William Rabbitt
Applicant
Dorothy Rabbitt
First Respondent
Attorney-General
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Charitable Trusts Variation and Correction of Will / Originating Application Under High Court Rules R19.5 and S32/s33 Charitable Trusts Act; Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the gift for community/district nurses is charitable
- 2 Whether the court can vary the will to substitute the named beneficiary organisation
- 3 Whether the testator manifested a general charitable intention permitting cy-près relief
Ratio Decidendi
Where a testator shows a general charitable intention directed to a specific charitable cause but refers to an organisation that is not the appropriate contemporary vehicle, the Court may, having ensured statutory advertising and an Attorney-General report, vary the will under ss32-33 to substitute a suitable charity (here Hutt Hospital Foundation) to carry out the charitable purpose (education and training of community/district nurses). The statutory prerequisites were satisfied and variation was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Variation of the will approved and correction permitted; costs awarded as specified.
Orders
- Vary the trusts created by the last will of Harry Sibun Kent dated 21 November 1995 by removing the words "Hutt District Nursing Trust" from clause 4 and inserting "The Hutt Hospital Foundation (to be held in a separate account for the specific purpose of education, training and professional development of community...
- Approve payment from the estate of the applicant's costs, the costs of the Crown Law Office on behalf of the Attorney-General, and costs of $3,845.60 to Mrs Lorraine Scoullar
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment