INVERNESS MEDICAL INNOVATIONS INC AND ANOR V MDS DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2007-404-748
The court accepted that plaintiffs made a genuine attempt to comply with the joinder conditions and that the deficiencies identified, while real, are not so serious as to deprive the defendants of a fair opportunity to respond or to nullify the earlier joinder order; defendants retain procedural remedies including strike out or application for further particulars and the court imposed a timetable governing either route.
- Citation
- openlaw-1f7ab98c_a0f7_47d8_a15b_d9255b7527cc.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Inverness Medical Innovations Inc; Second Plaintiff: Inverness Medical Switzerland GmbH; First Defendant: MDS Diagnostics Limited; Second Defendant: Prakash Appanna
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Proceedings Involving Alleged Copyright Infringement / Interlocutory Hearing on Compliance With Joinder Conditions and Potential Strike Out/further Particulars
- Outcome
- Conditional joinder upheld; defendants given choice to challenge or to file defences; court issued procedural timetable and reserved costs.
- Legal Topics
- Joinder, Particulars of Claim, Industrial Application, Infringement Allegations, Strike Out, Discovery/directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inverness Medical Innovations Inc
First Plaintiff
Inverness Medical Switzerland GmbH
Second Plaintiff
MDS Diagnostics Limited
First Defendant
Prakash Appanna
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Proceedings Involving Alleged Copyright Infringement / Interlocutory Hearing on Compliance With Joinder Conditions and Potential Strike Out/further Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second amended statement of claim identifies the exact copyright works relied on
- 2 Whether the pleading distinguishes original aspects of the works from material copied from earlier works
- 3 Whether the pleading specifies when the works were industrially applied
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted that plaintiffs made a genuine attempt to comply with the joinder conditions and that the deficiencies identified, while real, are not so serious as to deprive the defendants of a fair opportunity to respond or to nullify the earlier joinder order; defendants retain procedural remedies including strike out or application for further particulars and the court imposed a timetable governing either route.
Court Disposition
Conditional joinder upheld; defendants given choice to challenge or to file defences; court issued procedural timetable and reserved costs.
Orders
- If defendants elect to challenge, file application(s) by 4 September 2008 and matter listed for mention 5 September 2008
- If defendants elect to respond: statement of defence and/or counterclaim to be filed by 4 September 2008
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment