JOSALI TRUST LTD v SPENCER [2023] NZHC 3608

JOSALI TRUST LTD v SPENCER [2023] NZHC 3608

By consent, summary judgment is appropriate where parties agree the debt is owing; accordingly judgment was entered for the plaintiff for the principal sum, contractual interest under s22 of the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 for the pre-judgment period, post-judgment interest at the prescribed rate under ss10...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] NZHC 3608
Parties
Plaintiff: Josali Trust Limited and Pingao Trustee 508 Limited as trustees of Josali Trust; First Defendant: Jonathan Lindsay Spencer; Second Defendant: Steven John Douglas Hawkins
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
11 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt Claim / Summary Judgment by Consent (determined on Papers)
Outcome
Judgment entered against the first and second defendants by consent.
Legal Topics
Deed of Settlement, Deed of Debt, Summary Judgment, Interest Calculation, Costs
Contract Debt Recovery Civil Procedure Interest Law Deed of Settlement Deed of Debt Summary Judgment Interest Calculation +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josali Trust Limited and Pingao Trustee 508 Limited as trustees of Josali Trust

Plaintiff

Jonathan Lindsay Spencer

First Defendant

Steven John Douglas Hawkins

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Debt Claim / Summary Judgment by Consent (determined on Papers)

  1. 1 Whether the defendants were in default under the Deed of Settlement and Deed of Debt
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment was appropriate and could be entered by consent
  3. 3 Proper calculation and application of contractual and statutory interest and award of costs

Ratio Decidendi

By consent, summary judgment is appropriate where parties agree the debt is owing; accordingly judgment was entered for the plaintiff for the principal sum, contractual interest under s22 of the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 for the pre-judgment period, post-judgment interest at the prescribed rate under ss10 and 12, and costs on a 2B basis.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered against the first and second defendants by consent.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered against the first and second defendants in the sum of $650,000.
  • The first and second defendants will pay interest on the sum of $650,000 at the contractual rate of 10% per annum pursuant to section 22 of the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 for the period 1 August 2019 until the date of judgment.