MANUKAU v R [2021] NZCA 681

MANUKAU v R [2021] NZCA 681

The appeals were dismissed because the appellants failed to file grounds of appeal as directed and failed to appear, justifying dismissal for non-prosecution.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
MANUKAU v R [2021] NZCA 681
Parties
Appellant: Joseph Manukau; Appellant: Tia Richards; Respondent: The Queen
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
3 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Dismissed for Non Prosecution
Outcome
Appeals dismissed.
Legal Topics
Assault on a Child, Child Neglect, Wounding With Intent, Appeal Dismissal for Non Prosecution, Legal Aid Withdrawal
Criminal Law Appeal Procedure Sentencing Child Protection Assault on a Child Child Neglect Wounding With Intent Appeal Dismissal for Non Prosecution +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Manukau

Appellant

Tia Richards

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Dismissed for Non Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether appeals should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to file grounds and non-appearance
  2. 2 Effect of legal aid withdrawal and self-representation on prosecution of appeal
  3. 3 Appropriate disposition when court directions are not complied with

Ratio Decidendi

The appeals were dismissed because the appellants failed to file grounds of appeal as directed and failed to appear, justifying dismissal for non-prosecution.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution