MANUKAU v R [2021] NZCA 681
The appeals were dismissed because the appellants failed to file grounds of appeal as directed and failed to appear, justifying dismissal for non-prosecution.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MANUKAU v R [2021] NZCA 681
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Manukau; Appellant: Tia Richards; Respondent: The Queen
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Dismissed for Non Prosecution
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Assault on a Child, Child Neglect, Wounding With Intent, Appeal Dismissal for Non Prosecution, Legal Aid Withdrawal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Manukau
Appellant
Tia Richards
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Dismissed for Non Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appeals should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to file grounds and non-appearance
- 2 Effect of legal aid withdrawal and self-representation on prosecution of appeal
- 3 Appropriate disposition when court directions are not complied with
Ratio Decidendi
The appeals were dismissed because the appellants failed to file grounds of appeal as directed and failed to appear, justifying dismissal for non-prosecution.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed.
Orders
- Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
MANUKAU v R [2021] NZCA 681 [3 November 2021]IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROACA67/2021[2021] NZCA 581BETWEEN JOSEPH MANUKAUAppellantAND THE QUEENRespondentCA293/2021BETWEEN TIA RICHARDSAppellantAND THE QUEENRespondentHearing: 3 November 2021Court: Kós P, S France and Katz JJCounsel: No appearances by Appellants Z A Fuhr for RespondentJudgment: 3 November 2021 at 10.05 amReasons: 3 November 2021JUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe appeals are dismissed.____________________________________________________________________REASONS OF THE COURT(Given by Kós P)[1] These appeals were dismissed for non-prosecution.[2] In August 2020 Mr Manukau was convicted on three charges of assaulting a child and one charge each of child neglect, wounding with intent to injure and injuring with intent to injure. Ms Richards was convicted of assaulting a child and child neglect. In September 2020 Mr Manukau was sentenced to 12 months' home detention and Ms Richards to 12 months' intensive supervision, sentences they have completed.1[3] In February 2021 Mr Manukau filed a notice of appeal. Legal aid counsel was assigned. A priority fixture date of 28 July 2021 was allocated for his appeal, given he was subject to a short sentence.[4] In May 2021 Ms Richards filed a notice of appeal. In June 2021 counsel applied to adjourn the appeal fixture. This Court directed on 1 July 2021 that the fixture date be adjourned on the basis that Mr Manukau's and Ms Richards' appeals should be heard together. Legal aid counsel was thereafter assigned for Ms Richards also.[5] On 19 July 2021 this Court directed that Mr Manukau's and Ms Richards' appeals be heard together, and that full particularised grounds of appeal be filed and served by 10 September 2021. Shortly thereafter the Court allocated a new fixture date of 3 November 2021.[6] Grounds of appeal were not filed as directed. In September 2021 both legal aid counsel advised the Court that full grants of legal aid were not forthcoming. Leave to withdraw was granted on 27 September 2021, it being noted that Mr Manukau and Ms Richards were now self-represented.[7] The Court then directed that Mr Manukau and Ms Richards file and serve their grounds of appeal by 13 October 2021 and submissions by 20 October 2021. A final extension was granted by this Court to the appellants to file and serve submissions (incorporating their grounds of appeal) by 27 October 2021, on the express basis that1 R v Manukau [2020] NZDC 18987.if that was not done, the appeals would be called on 3 November 2021 and dismissed. It was not done.[8] The appeals were called this morning. There were no appearances for the appellants and the appeals were dismissed accordingly.Solicitors:Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent