EGGINK & ORS v EGGINK & ORS [2014] NZHC 1784
By consent the Court ordered the removal of Ann Ellen Eggink as trustee and appointed Wayne Seymour Chapman as independent trustee, conferring on him the usual powers of a trustee together with express, binding decision‑making powers to resolve deadlocks and to overrule co‑trustees where necessary to protect the life tenant and beneficiaries; the declaration claim as to indebtedness was adjourned and costs were reserved.
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 1784
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Joy Ellen Campbell; Plaintiff: Michael Richard Eggink; Plaintiff: Antonie Hendrik Eggink; Second Plaintiffs: Antonie Hendrik Eggink and Michael Richard Eggink (as partners in the Antonie Hendrik Eggink and Michael Richard Eggink Farm Partnership); Second Defendant / Life Tenant and Trustee: Ann Ellen (Ann) Eggink; Trustee / Defendant: Ross (R) Dunlop
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Trusts; Estate; Declaratory Relief; Trustee Act Application / Interim Judgment (consent Orders)
- Outcome
- Consent orders made: Ann Ellen Eggink removed as trustee and replaced by Wayne Seymour Chapman who is vested with usual trustee powers and specific binding powers to resolve disputes; second cause (declaration of indebtedness) adjourned; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Removal and Replacement of Trustees, Appointment of Independent Trustee, Trustee Powers and Deadlock Resolution, Life Interest and Maintenance Advances, Court Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Trusts, Declaration of Indebtedness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joy Ellen Campbell
Plaintiff
Michael Richard Eggink
Plaintiff
Antonie Hendrik Eggink
Plaintiff
Antonie Hendrik Eggink and Michael Richard Eggink (as partners in the Antonie Hendrik Eggink and Michael Richard Eggink Farm Partnership)
Second Plaintiffs
Ann Ellen (Ann) Eggink
Second Defendant / Life Tenant and Trustee
Ross (R) Dunlop
Trustee / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trusts; Estate; Declaratory Relief; Trustee Act Application / Interim Judgment (consent Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a trustee (Ann/Ann Ellen Eggink) should be removed and replaced by an independent trustee by consent under s 51 Trustee Act 1956 and the Court's supervisory jurisdiction
- 2 Whether the Court may confer on the replacement trustee binding powers to resolve deadlocks and to override co‑trustees where necessary to protect the life tenant and beneficiaries
- 3 Whether the life tenant (Ann) is indebted to the Antonie and Michael partnership in respect of advances for purchase/erection of a dwelling (declaration sought)
Ratio Decidendi
By consent the Court ordered the removal of Ann Ellen Eggink as trustee and appointed Wayne Seymour Chapman as independent trustee, conferring on him the usual powers of a trustee together with express, binding decision‑making powers to resolve deadlocks and to overrule co‑trustees where necessary to protect the life tenant and beneficiaries; the declaration claim as to indebtedness was adjourned and costs were reserved.
Court Disposition
Consent orders made: Ann Ellen Eggink removed as trustee and replaced by Wayne Seymour Chapman who is vested with usual trustee powers and specific binding powers to resolve disputes; second cause (declaration of indebtedness) adjourned; costs reserved.
Orders
- Ann Ellen Eggink is removed as a trustee of the Estate of Hendrik Eggink and replaced by Wayne Seymour Chapman of Wellington, Solicitor.
- Wayne Seymour Chapman is to have all usual powers of a trustee conferred by law and the terms of the will and, in addition, the powers to act as an independent trustee in the estate; to make binding decisions where the other trustees cannot agree; to overrule the other trustees if he considers their decision is not...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment