Li v 110 Formosa (NZ) Limited [2019] NZHC 1083
On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff was the beneficial owner of the $4.8m; resulting trust and breach of contract remedies were available against Meng Wang in respect of the portion of his shareholding reflecting that contribution; claims for an institutional constructive trust over the underlying property and most other pleaded causes failed; costs are to be assessed under High Court Rules as Category 2 with awards and adjustments made to reflect partial success, unreasonable pleading/conduct and specific disbursement limitations; settlement privilege under s57 Evidence Act cannot be unilaterally waived and only part of the 2015 communication was waived by plaintiff's...
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 1083
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jun Li; First Defendant: 110 Formosa (NZ) Limited; Second Defendant: Meng Wang; Third Defendant (discontinued): Dingzhi Huang; Fourth Defendant: Golden Beachlands Holdings Limited; Fifth Defendant: Jenny and Eamon Holdings Limited; Sixth Defendant: Loo & Koo
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil – Trust, Contract and Property Dispute / Costs Determination Following Substantive Judgment (post Trial/costs Judgment)
- Outcome
- Costs orders made against and in favour of various parties after trial: plaintiff partially successful against second defendant; costs awards adjusted, some disbursements disallowed or reduced; indemnity costs denied; modest Bullock contribution ordered from second defendant to successful defendants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust (quistclose), Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty and Knowing Assistance, Dishonest Assistance, Costs Orders and Indemnity Costs, Sanderson/bullock Orders, Settlement Privilege and Waiver
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jun Li
Plaintiff
110 Formosa (NZ) Limited
First Defendant
Meng Wang
Second Defendant
Dingzhi Huang
Third Defendant (discontinued)
Golden Beachlands Holdings Limited
Fourth Defendant
Jenny and Eamon Holdings Limited
Fifth Defendant
Loo & Koo
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil – Trust, Contract and Property Dispute / Costs Determination Following Substantive Judgment (post Trial/costs Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the plaintiff the beneficial owner of the $4.8 million deposited?
- 2 Whether resulting or constructive trust remedies arose in plaintiff's favour
- 3 Whether fiduciary duties or dishonest assistance were established against defendants
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff was the beneficial owner of the $4.8m; resulting trust and breach of contract remedies were available against Meng Wang in respect of the portion of his shareholding reflecting that contribution; claims for an institutional constructive trust over the underlying property and most other pleaded causes failed; costs are to be assessed under High Court Rules as Category 2 with awards and adjustments made to reflect partial success, unreasonable pleading/conduct and specific disbursement limitations; settlement privilege under s57 Evidence Act cannot be unilaterally waived and only part of the 2015 communication was waived by plaintiff's...
Court Disposition
Costs orders made against and in favour of various parties after trial: plaintiff partially successful against second defendant; costs awards adjusted, some disbursements disallowed or reduced; indemnity costs denied; modest Bullock contribution ordered from second defendant to successful defendants' costs.
Orders
- Costs awarded to Jun Li against Meng Wang assessed on High Court Rules Category 2B scale, reduced by 20% to reflect partial success and conduct; disbursements awarded but excluding fees of Jai Basrur and Mr Moore and allowing $15,000 for valuation expert Seagar.
- Costs awarded to 110 Formosa (First Defendant) against Jun Li assessed on Category 2B scale plus disbursements ($220 filing fee accepted); no uplift for increased or indemnity costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment