SJ FOOTE AND SD FOOTE AS TRUSTEES OF THE FOOTE FAMILY TRUST V KELTERN STUD LIMITED HC NAP CIV-2012-441-497
Leave to file the statement of defence out of time was granted because the defendant demonstrated an arguable defence as to the characterisation of the $313,213, solvency was not shown to be established, considerations of justice favored permitting the defence and allowing full evidential exchange before deciding the liquidation application.
- Citation
- openlaw-92d7f98e_e152_41d9_8521_37dfcd5bddeb.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff Trustee of the Foote Family Trust: Susanne Jane Foote; Plaintiff Trustee of the Foote Family Trust: Stuart David Foote; Defendant: Keltern Stud Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Liquidation Application Pursuant to Statutory Demand / Application for Leave to File Statement of Defence Out of Time; Liquidation Hearing Timetabled
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the defendant to file its statement of defence out of time; liquidation application adjourned and timetabled for hearing
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Shareholders' Loans Vs Equity, Just and Equitable Winding Up, Extension of Time to File Defences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susanne Jane Foote
Plaintiff Trustee of the Foote Family Trust
Stuart David Foote
Plaintiff Trustee of the Foote Family Trust
Keltern Stud Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Liquidation Application Pursuant to Statutory Demand / Application for Leave to File Statement of Defence Out of Time; Liquidation Hearing Timetabled
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the $313,213 is a debt (shareholders' loan) or equity (shareholder funds)
- 2 Whether the defendant company is insolvent
- 3 Whether leave should be granted to file a statement of defence out of time
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to file the statement of defence out of time was granted because the defendant demonstrated an arguable defence as to the characterisation of the $313,213, solvency was not shown to be established, considerations of justice favored permitting the defence and allowing full evidential exchange before deciding the liquidation application.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the defendant to file its statement of defence out of time; liquidation application adjourned and timetabled for hearing
Orders
- Leave granted to the defendant company to file and serve its statement of defence out of time
- Registrar to liaise with counsel to set the plaintiffs' liquidation application down for a half‑day hearing at the first available suitable date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment