LEVIN & ANOR V MCDONNELL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2007-404-005708

LEVIN & ANOR V MCDONNELL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2007-404-005708

The Court entered summary judgment for the undisputed portion of the debt ($1,100,700) because the partnership liability was not disputed and the defendants failed to provide sufficient evidential foundation for their alleged defences; tax/GST adjustment and the $10,000 reconciliation require fuller procedures (eg s284 or trial) and cannot defeat summary judgment, but execution was stayed to allow defendants to seek those remedies or agree indemnity for liquidators to pursue tax reassessment.

Citation
openlaw-3901a235_722f_4a02_a7fd_8b5b55c56466.pdf
Parties
Plaintiffs / Liquidators: Henry David Levin and Barry Phillip Jordan (liquidators of McDonnell Contractors Limited (in liquidation)); First Defendant: Wayne John McDonnell; Second Defendant: Debra Lane McDonnell
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
18 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Liquidation Summary Judgment Application / Oral Summary Judgment (application Under High Court Rules R136)
Outcome
Judgment entered against the defendants jointly and severally for $1,100,700.00; remaining claim adjourned to the standard track; stay of execution until 1 May 2008; costs fixed on Category 2 Band B plus disbursements with liability reserved.
Legal Topics
Liquidation, Summary Judgment, Directors' Liabilities, Creditor Claims, Tax Reassessment, Stay of Execution, Companies Act S284, Companies Act S250
Company Law Insolvency Civil Procedure Tax Law Liquidation Summary Judgment Directors' Liabilities Creditor Claims +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry David Levin and Barry Phillip Jordan (liquidators of McDonnell Contractors Limited (in liquidation))

Plaintiffs / Liquidators

Wayne John McDonnell

First Defendant

Debra Lane McDonnell

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Liquidation Summary Judgment Application / Oral Summary Judgment (application Under High Court Rules R136)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants have a bona fide defence to the liquidators' claim for the partnership debt
  2. 2 Whether alleged tax/GST consequences and a $10,000 receipt require inquiry that defeats summary judgment
  3. 3 Whether liquidators should be required to pursue amendment of past tax returns without indemnity

Ratio Decidendi

The Court entered summary judgment for the undisputed portion of the debt ($1,100,700) because the partnership liability was not disputed and the defendants failed to provide sufficient evidential foundation for their alleged defences; tax/GST adjustment and the $10,000 reconciliation require fuller procedures (eg s284 or trial) and cannot defeat summary judgment, but execution was stayed to allow defendants to seek those remedies or agree indemnity for liquidators to pursue tax reassessment.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered against the defendants jointly and severally for $1,100,700.00; remaining claim adjourned to the standard track; stay of execution until 1 May 2008; costs fixed on Category 2 Band B plus disbursements with liability reserved.

Orders

  • Judgment against the defendants jointly and severally for $1,100,700.00
  • Balance of the plaintiffs' claim adjourned for completion under the standard track and listed in chambers at 2:15pm on 1 May 2008 (with consideration of transfer to District Court under s46 District Courts Act 1947 or orders under Schedule 5 High Court Rules)