LEVIN & ORS V LAWRENCE & ORS HC AK CIV-2012-404-0956

LEVIN & ORS V LAWRENCE & ORS HC AK CIV-2012-404-0956

The Court dismissed the application because the respondents had deposed to a full and reasonable investigation showing no assets or voidable transactions; the statutory presumption against creditor access under s256(1)(a)(ii) requires a good reason to order inspection and the applicants did not establish any such reason or an arguable basis to reopen the liquidation.

Citation
openlaw-b2990f39_0f27_4443_974c_b2c4040d13df.pdf
Parties
Applicant Joint Liquidator of Personal Homes Limited: Henry David Levin; Applicant Joint Liquidator of Personal Homes Limited: Vivien Judith Madsen‑Ries; Respondent Joint Liquidator of Waterman Building Supplies Limited: Stephen Mark Lawrence; Respondent Joint Liquidator of Waterman Building Supplies Limited: Anthony John McCullagh; Interested Party / Creditor: Fletcher Developments Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
25 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Companies Act 1993 Liquidation / Inspection Application / Judgment on Originating Application (application to Inspect Records and Reverse Final Report Dismissed)
Outcome
Originating application dismissed; leave granted to bring proceeding by originating application under High Court Rules r19.5; costs reserved
Legal Topics
Liquidation, Inspection of Records, Final Liquidator's Report, Voidable Preferences, Court Supervisory Jurisdiction
Company Law Insolvency Law Liquidation Inspection of Records Final Liquidator's Report Voidable Preferences Court Supervisory Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry David Levin

Applicant Joint Liquidator of Personal Homes Limited

Vivien Judith Madsen‑Ries

Applicant Joint Liquidator of Personal Homes Limited

Stephen Mark Lawrence

Respondent Joint Liquidator of Waterman Building Supplies Limited

Anthony John McCullagh

Respondent Joint Liquidator of Waterman Building Supplies Limited

Fletcher Developments Limited

Interested Party / Creditor

Procedural Posture

Companies Act 1993 Liquidation / Inspection Application / Judgment on Originating Application (application to Inspect Records and Reverse Final Report Dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court should order inspection of the liquidators' records and company records under s256(1)(a)(ii) Companies Act 1993
  2. 2 Whether the filing of a liquidator's final report should be reversed and liquidators reinstated
  3. 3 What standard or threshold applies to creditor requests to inspect liquidation records

Ratio Decidendi

The Court dismissed the application because the respondents had deposed to a full and reasonable investigation showing no assets or voidable transactions; the statutory presumption against creditor access under s256(1)(a)(ii) requires a good reason to order inspection and the applicants did not establish any such reason or an arguable basis to reopen the liquidation.

Court Disposition

Originating application dismissed; leave granted to bring proceeding by originating application under High Court Rules r19.5; costs reserved

Orders

  • Leave granted under r19.5 of the High Court Rules to bring proceeding by originating application
  • All substantive applications dismissed (no order under s256(1)(a)(ii) for inspection; no reversal of final report)