GRANT & KHOV AS LIQUIDATORS OF NZ PROPERTIES HOLDING LIMITED (IN LIQ) V CP ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD HC AK CIV-2012-404-005014
Because the liquidators went beyond a neutral statutory role and actively sought to set aside the creditors' resolution and opposed appointment of alternative liquidators, they assumed an adversarial role and were personally liable for the opponents' costs; the court awarded the first to sixth respondents NZD...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-6a34aa49_25af_4492_8f7e_3d057119b965.pdf
- Parties
- Applicants: Damien Grant and Steven Khov as Liquidators of NZ Properties Holding Limited (in Liquidation); First Respondent: CP Asset Management Limited; Second Respondent: Asia Pacific Hotel Investments Limited; Third Respondent: C P Retail Holdings Limited; Fourth Respondent: Raisons Pacific Investments Limited; Fifth Respondent: South Island Hotel Investments Limited; Sixth Respondent: Yeil C & M Limited; Seventh Respondents: Brian and Bridgit Lawrence
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Act S243(7) and S245 a Application to Set Aside Creditors' Resolution and Appointment of Alternative Liquidators / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Application; Costs Reserved and Now Decided
- Outcome
- Applicants ordered personally to pay costs to first to sixth respondents; no uplift ordered; no s45(5) order made in relation to seventh respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Liability for Costs, Creditors' Resolutions, Application Under S245 a, Costs Banding and Uplift, Legal Services Act S45(5) Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damien Grant and Steven Khov as Liquidators of NZ Properties Holding Limited (in Liquidation)
Applicants
CP Asset Management Limited
First Respondent
Asia Pacific Hotel Investments Limited
Second Respondent
C P Retail Holdings Limited
Third Respondent
Raisons Pacific Investments Limited
Fourth Respondent
South Island Hotel Investments Limited
Fifth Respondent
Yeil C & M Limited
Sixth Respondent
Brian and Bridgit Lawrence
Seventh Respondents
Procedural Posture
Companies Act S243(7) and S245 a Application to Set Aside Creditors' Resolution and Appointment of Alternative Liquidators / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Application; Costs Reserved and Now Decided
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liquidators are personally liable for costs when they take an active adversarial role
- 2 Whether the unsuccessful applicants should pay costs on 2B band with band C for initial opposition affidavits
- 3 Whether an uplift of costs is warranted
Ratio Decidendi
Because the liquidators went beyond a neutral statutory role and actively sought to set aside the creditors' resolution and opposed appointment of alternative liquidators, they assumed an adversarial role and were personally liable for the opponents' costs; the court awarded the first to sixth respondents NZD 8,955.00, refused any uplift, and declined to make an order under s45(5) in relation to the seventh respondents.
Court Disposition
Applicants ordered personally to pay costs to first to sixth respondents; no uplift ordered; no s45(5) order made in relation to seventh respondents.
Orders
- Applicants to pay the first to sixth respondents costs in the sum of $8,955.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment