ADAMS AND BUCHANAN (AS LIQUDIATORS OF STARPLUS HOMES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)) v SUN [2014] NZHC 913
The Court held the liquidators were necessary parties and r14.6(4)(c) applied; their decision to bring a s284 directions application was justified given limitations of s200 to mortgagees and the need to place liquidation context and statutory protection before the Court; however because substantial work also benefited preferential and unsecured creditors, one-third of the claimed costs should be deducted and two-thirds paid from the fund, resulting in an award of $24,650.34 plus agreed disbursements and filing/service costs; leave reserved on detailed incidence among claimants.
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 913
- Parties
- Applicant (liquidator of Starplus Homes Ltd (in Liquidation)): Shaun Neil Adams; Applicant (liquidator of Starplus Homes Ltd (in Liquidation)): John Robert Buchanan; First Respondent: David Wei Sun; Second Respondent: Magsons Hardware Ltd; Third Respondent: Hamilton Hardware Retail Ltd; Fourth Respondent: United Timber Merchants Ltd; Fifth Respondent: Dale King Building Supplies Ltd; Sixth Respondent: RD 1 Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Directions Application Under the Companies Act 1993 Concerning Distribution of Surplus Funds From Mortgagee Sale / Costs Determination Following Directions Hearing and Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Liquidators awarded part indemnity costs to be paid from the fund held in Court; residual questions on incidence reserved
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator's Costs, Distribution of Surplus Funds, Indemnity Costs, Section 284 Companies Act 1993, Section 200 Property Law Act 2007, High Court Rules R14.6, Priority of Creditors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shaun Neil Adams
Applicant (liquidator of Starplus Homes Ltd (in Liquidation))
John Robert Buchanan
Applicant (liquidator of Starplus Homes Ltd (in Liquidation))
David Wei Sun
First Respondent
Magsons Hardware Ltd
Second Respondent
Hamilton Hardware Retail Ltd
Third Respondent
United Timber Merchants Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Dale King Building Supplies Ltd
Fifth Respondent
RD 1 Ltd
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Directions Application Under the Companies Act 1993 Concerning Distribution of Surplus Funds From Mortgagee Sale / Costs Determination Following Directions Hearing and Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liquidators were a necessary party to proceedings affecting the fund
- 2 Whether indemnity costs under r14.6(4)(c) should be awarded to the liquidators
- 3 Whether the liquidators acted reasonably in bringing a separate s284 directions application instead of using the s200 proceeding
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the liquidators were necessary parties and r14.6(4)(c) applied; their decision to bring a s284 directions application was justified given limitations of s200 to mortgagees and the need to place liquidation context and statutory protection before the Court; however because substantial work also benefited preferential and unsecured creditors, one-third of the claimed costs should be deducted and two-thirds paid from the fund, resulting in an award of $24,650.34 plus agreed disbursements and filing/service costs; leave reserved on detailed incidence among claimants.
Court Disposition
Liquidators awarded part indemnity costs to be paid from the fund held in Court; residual questions on incidence reserved
Orders
- Liquidators to be paid $24,650.34 out of the surplus funds on account of costs
- Agreed disbursements (including filing fees $643.48) and costs of service ($565) to be paid out of the fund
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment