GRANT AND KHOV as liquidators of RANOLF COMPANY LTD (In liquidation) v BHANA [2018] NZHC 1527
Liquidators were entitled to indemnity costs despite using in-house counsel because the in-house time was billed to the company by invoice and the liquidators acted in a representative capacity; the court fixed actual and reasonable indemnity costs at $41,330.00 and disbursements at $4,001.09 and refused to reserve costs pending appeal.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1527
- Parties
- Applicants: Damien Grant and Steven Khov as liquidators of Ranolf Company Ltd (In liquidation); First Respondent: Stephen Bhana; Second Respondent: Jasu Mati Bhana
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application in Liquidation Proceedings / Costs Determination (indemnity Costs)
- Outcome
- Applicants' (liquidators') indemnity costs and disbursements awarded; respondents ordered to pay specified sums; costs not reserved pending appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidators' Costs, In House Counsel Costs, Indemnity Costs, Service of Process, Appeal Reservation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damien Grant and Steven Khov as liquidators of Ranolf Company Ltd (In liquidation)
Applicants
Stephen Bhana
First Respondent
Jasu Mati Bhana
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application in Liquidation Proceedings / Costs Determination (indemnity Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liquidators represented by in-house counsel are entitled to costs
- 2 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded and, if so, the quantum of actual and reasonable costs
- 3 Whether costs should be reserved pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Liquidators were entitled to indemnity costs despite using in-house counsel because the in-house time was billed to the company by invoice and the liquidators acted in a representative capacity; the court fixed actual and reasonable indemnity costs at $41,330.00 and disbursements at $4,001.09 and refused to reserve costs pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Applicants' (liquidators') indemnity costs and disbursements awarded; respondents ordered to pay specified sums; costs not reserved pending appeal.
Orders
- The First and Second Respondents are ordered to pay the Applicants (liquidators) $41,330.00 as actual and reasonable costs
- The First and Second Respondents are ordered to pay the Applicants (liquidators) $4,001.09 for disbursements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment