R v BAX [2018] NZHC 411

R v BAX [2018] NZHC 411

The Court held that s104(1) was engaged because the offender became unlawfully present in the victim's dwelling during the attack, the killing involved a high level of brutality and callousness, and the 77-year-old victim was particularly vulnerable in bed and unarmed; notwithstanding that engagement, imposing the statutory 17-year minimum would be manifestly unjust on the facts given mitigation (guilty plea, genuine remorse, mental health history not shown to be causative or exculpatory), and the appropriate minimum term was reduced to 15 years, with life imprisonment imposed.

Citation
[2018] NZHC 411
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Marcus Bax
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
13 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal: Murder / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted of murder; sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 15 years
Legal Topics
Murder, Minimum Period of Imprisonment, Section 104 Sentencing Act 2002, Vulnerability of Victim, Brutality and Callousness, Home Invasion, Guilty Plea Mitigation, Mental Health Mitigation
Criminal Law Sentencing Murder Minimum Period of Imprisonment Section 104 Sentencing Act 2002 Vulnerability of Victim Brutality and Callousness Home Invasion +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Marcus Bax

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal: Murder / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether life imprisonment is required for murder under s102 Sentencing Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether s104(1) Sentencing Act 2002 is engaged requiring a 17-year minimum term
  3. 3 Whether the offender's presence at the victim's home was unlawful (home invasion)

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that s104(1) was engaged because the offender became unlawfully present in the victim's dwelling during the attack, the killing involved a high level of brutality and callousness, and the 77-year-old victim was particularly vulnerable in bed and unarmed; notwithstanding that engagement, imposing the statutory 17-year minimum would be manifestly unjust on the facts given mitigation (guilty plea, genuine remorse, mental health history not shown to be causative or exculpatory), and the appropriate minimum term was reduced to 15 years, with life imprisonment imposed.

Court Disposition

Convicted of murder; sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 15 years

Orders

  • Conviction entered for murder
  • Sentenced to imprisonment for life with a minimum period of imprisonment of not less than 15 years