Hennessy v QBE Workable Ltd (Formerly HIH Workable Ltd)
Judge found on the balance of probabilities that the appellant's current back problems are likely linked to the 1995 injury and/or the March 2000 accident and that she is entitled to reasonable treatment causally connected to those covered injuries; however the judge declined to make final orders because medical...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] NZACC 358
- Parties
- Appellant: MAREE HENNESSY; Respondent: QBE WORKABLE LTD (FORMERLY HIH WORKABLE LTD)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Accident Insurance Act 1998 Review of Insurer Decision / District Court Review Hearing (decision Reserved for Further Directions)
- Outcome
- Decision reserved and appeal not finally determined; court directs further process rather than altering primary decision at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Causation, Entitlement to Treatment, Weekly Compensation, Medical Evidence, Scope of Cover
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAREE HENNESSY
Appellant
QBE WORKABLE LTD (FORMERLY HIH WORKABLE LTD)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Accident Insurance Act 1998 Review of Insurer Decision / District Court Review Hearing (decision Reserved for Further Directions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent has a continuing liability for incapacity arising from the 2 March 2000 work injury
- 2 Whether rehabilitative treatment is necessary, appropriate and normal in relation to the covered injury
- 3 Causation between the 1995 injury, the March 2000 accident and the February 2001 incident
Ratio Decidendi
Judge found on the balance of probabilities that the appellant's current back problems are likely linked to the 1995 injury and/or the March 2000 accident and that she is entitled to reasonable treatment causally connected to those covered injuries; however the judge declined to make final orders because medical evidence was insufficiently focused and directed further medical evidence and a conference to determine appropriate rehabilitative treatment and whether weekly compensation has been properly applied for; insurer liability remains limited to treatment causally connected to the covered injuries under Schedule 1 of the Accident Insurance Act 1998.
Court Disposition
Decision reserved and appeal not finally determined; court directs further process rather than altering primary decision at this stage.
Orders
- Registrar to arrange a telephone conference between both counsel and the judge as soon as reasonably convenient
- Parties to obtain and file focused further medical evidence addressing causation and appropriate rehabilitation and to advise whether an application for weekly compensation has been made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment