R v MARK DAVID JOHN FRANKLIN [2018] NZHC 1868
Preventive detention imposed because the offender demonstrates a clear pattern of serious violent and sexual offending against intimate partners, the offending caused significant psychological harm, risk assessment reports indicate a high likelihood of reoffending, prior ESO failed to protect the community, and a finite sentence would not provide adequate protection; minimum period fixed at five years.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1868
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Mark David John Franklin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Preventive detention
- Legal Topics
- Kidnapping, Male Assaults Female, Assault With a Weapon, Extended Supervision Order, Guilty Plea Discount, Victim Impact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Mark David John Franklin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether preventive detention is necessary under s 87 Sentencing Act 2002
- 2 Whether the offender's criminal history discloses a pattern of serious offending
- 3 Appropriate starting point and uplifts for kidnapping and related offending
Ratio Decidendi
Preventive detention imposed because the offender demonstrates a clear pattern of serious violent and sexual offending against intimate partners, the offending caused significant psychological harm, risk assessment reports indicate a high likelihood of reoffending, prior ESO failed to protect the community, and a finite sentence would not provide adequate protection; minimum period fixed at five years.
Court Disposition
Preventive detention
Orders
- Sentence of preventive detention imposed with minimum period of imprisonment of five years
- First-strike warning given under three-strikes provisions and written notice to be provided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment