R v MARK DAVID JOHN FRANKLIN [2018] NZHC 1868

R v MARK DAVID JOHN FRANKLIN [2018] NZHC 1868

Preventive detention imposed because the offender demonstrates a clear pattern of serious violent and sexual offending against intimate partners, the offending caused significant psychological harm, risk assessment reports indicate a high likelihood of reoffending, prior ESO failed to protect the community, and a finite sentence would not provide adequate protection; minimum period fixed at five years.

Citation
[2018] NZHC 1868
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Mark David John Franklin
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
19 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Preventive detention
Legal Topics
Kidnapping, Male Assaults Female, Assault With a Weapon, Extended Supervision Order, Guilty Plea Discount, Victim Impact

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Mark David John Franklin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether preventive detention is necessary under s 87 Sentencing Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether the offender's criminal history discloses a pattern of serious offending
  3. 3 Appropriate starting point and uplifts for kidnapping and related offending

Ratio Decidendi

Preventive detention imposed because the offender demonstrates a clear pattern of serious violent and sexual offending against intimate partners, the offending caused significant psychological harm, risk assessment reports indicate a high likelihood of reoffending, prior ESO failed to protect the community, and a finite sentence would not provide adequate protection; minimum period fixed at five years.

Court Disposition

Preventive detention

Orders

  • Sentence of preventive detention imposed with minimum period of imprisonment of five years
  • First-strike warning given under three-strikes provisions and written notice to be provided