McLAUGHLIN v McLAUGHLIN [2020] NZHC 144
Key interlocutory steps and preparation warranted assessment on a 2C basis; filing of the memorandum of counsel dated 4 October 2019 warranted 2B; no additional percentage uplift under r14.6(3) beyond 2C; second counsel not certified; trustees entitled to indemnity from the Trust for the balance of their costs up to $39,182 plus GST after deducting costs payable by the plaintiffs; costs of this costs application to lie where they fall.
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 144
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark James McLaughlin; Plaintiff: Andrew Ashley McLaughlin; First Defendant: John David Manuel McLaughlin; First Defendant: Glasgow Harley Trustee Limited; First Defendant: Mark William Russell; Second Defendant: Brian James Maurice Nelson; Interested Party: Edna McLaughlin; Respondents: Respondents'/Plaintiffs' Children; Interested Party: Brett McLaughlin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Dispute; Application for Interim Injunction / Costs Determination After Interim Injunction Hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs to pay defendants costs on a 2C basis for all steps except filing the 4 October 2019 memorandum of counsel where 2B applies; defendants' disbursements as claimed; costs of this costs application to lie where they fall; trustees entitled to indemnity from the Trust for the balance of their costs up to...
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Trustee Indemnity, Beddoe Applications, Privilege, High Court Scale Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark James McLaughlin
Plaintiff
Andrew Ashley McLaughlin
Plaintiff
John David Manuel McLaughlin
First Defendant
Glasgow Harley Trustee Limited
First Defendant
Mark William Russell
First Defendant
Brian James Maurice Nelson
Second Defendant
Edna McLaughlin
Interested Party
Respondents'/Plaintiffs' Children
Respondents
Brett McLaughlin
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Trust Dispute; Application for Interim Injunction / Costs Determination After Interim Injunction Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be assessed on Band B or Band C under High Court Rules r14
- 2 Whether an uplift under r14.6(3) was justified
- 3 Whether second counsel should be certified
Ratio Decidendi
Key interlocutory steps and preparation warranted assessment on a 2C basis; filing of the memorandum of counsel dated 4 October 2019 warranted 2B; no additional percentage uplift under r14.6(3) beyond 2C; second counsel not certified; trustees entitled to indemnity from the Trust for the balance of their costs up to $39,182 plus GST after deducting costs payable by the plaintiffs; costs of this costs application to lie where they fall.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs to pay defendants costs on a 2C basis for all steps except filing the 4 October 2019 memorandum of counsel where 2B applies; defendants' disbursements as claimed; costs of this costs application to lie where they fall; trustees entitled to indemnity from the Trust for the balance of their costs up to...
Orders
- Plaintiffs to pay defendants costs calculated on a 2C basis for all steps except filing the memorandum of counsel dated 4 October 2019 where 2B costs apply
- Plaintiffs to pay the disbursements set out in Table 1 to the defendants' costs memorandum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment