ANGUS v R [2017] NZCA 452
Appeal dismissed because appellant failed to demonstrate any error or miscarriage of justice sufficient to allow the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] 2 NZLR 218
- Parties
- Appellant: Melissa Jane Angus; Respondent: The Queen
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Dismissed
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Melissa Jane Angus
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's grounds of appeal established an error of law or fact warranting allowance of the appeal
- 2 Whether any alleged error resulted in a miscarriage of justice
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal dismissed because appellant failed to demonstrate any error or miscarriage of justice sufficient to allow the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
ANGUS v R [2017] NZCA 452 [11 October 2017]IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCA302/2017[2017] NZCA 452BETWEEN MELISSA JANE ANGUSAppellantAND THE QUEENRespondentHearing: 11 October 2017Court: Kós P, Woolford and Collins JJCounsel: J Mahuta-Coyle for AppellantP D Marshall for RespondentJudgment: 11 October 2017 at 12.35 pmJUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe appeal is dismissed.____________________________________________________________________[Reasons to follow]Solicitors:Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent