MAIN v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2019] NZSC 2
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction: s71 of the Senior Courts Act 2016 limits criminal appeals to those authorised by Part 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011, and that Part contains no provision permitting appeals to the Supreme Court from Court of Appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] NZSC 2
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Main; Respondent: New Zealand Police
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (leave to Appeal) / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Registrar Review, Finality of High Court Refusal, Appealability of Registrar Decisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Main
Applicant
New Zealand Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (leave to Appeal) / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear an application for leave to appeal against a Court of Appeal judge's review of a Deputy Registrar's decision
- 2 Whether a High Court decision refusing leave for a second appeal is final and not amenable to further appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction: s71 of the Senior Courts Act 2016 limits criminal appeals to those authorised by Part 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011, and that Part contains no provision permitting appeals to the Supreme Court from Court of Appeal judges' reviews of Registrar or Deputy Registrar decisions; accordingly the Court could not hear the application.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
MAIN v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2019] NZSC 2 [18 February 2019]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALANDI TE KŌTI MANA NUISC 2/2019[2019] NZSC 2BETWEEN MICHAEL MAINApplicantAND NEW ZEALAND POLICERespondentCourt: Glazebrook, O'Regan and Ellen France JJCounsel: Applicant in personJudgment: 18 February 2019JUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe application for leave to appeal is dismissed.____________________________________________________________________REASONS[1] The applicant was found liable by a Community Magistrate under infringementnotices issued for various transport-related offences.1 He appealed to the DistrictCourt challenging the jurisdiction of the Court over him because of his status as aMāori. His appeal was dismissed.2 He then applied for leave to appeal to the HighCourt. Again, his arguments were directed to the proposition that the Court did nothave jurisdiction over him. Leave was declined.3[2] The applicant then attempted to file in the Court of Appeal an application forleave to appeal to that Court. The Deputy Registrar declined to accept this application.1 Police v Main DC Hamilton CRI-2017-019-8526, 22 June 2018.2 Main v Police [2018] NZDC 15859 (Judge Menzies).3 Main v Police [2018] NZHC 1828 (Brewer J).The Deputy Registrar pointed out, in a letter to the applicant, that the decision of theHigh Court was final and no further appeal was available.[3] The applicant applied for a review of the Deputy Registrar's decision by ajudge of the Court of Appeal. Brown J upheld the Deputy Registrar's decision.4 Henoted that a decision of the High Court refusing to give leave for a second appeal isfinal and not amenable to appeal to the Court of Appeal.5[4] The applicant then filed an application for leave to appeal to this Court againstthe decision of Brown J. This Court's jurisdiction in relation to appeals in criminalproceedings is governed by s 71 of the Senior Courts Act 2016, which, relevantly,provides that this Court may hear and determine appeals authorised by Part 6 of theCriminal Procedure Act 2011. No provision is made in that Part for appeals againstdecisions of Court of Appeal judges dealing with a review of a decision of a Registraror Deputy Registrar.[5] As the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the applicationfor leave to appeal, the application is dismissed.4 Main v Police [2018] NZCA 527.5 At [9], referring to s 213(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011.