HING v HING [2018] NZHC 2315

HING v HING [2018] NZHC 2315

Because Linda lacks capacity and the applicants possess authority under enduring powers of attorney and the trust deed to remove and appoint trustees, it was proper under s 52 Trustee Act 1956 and the High Court Rules to vest the trust property in the continuing trustee and the applicants, grant leave to apply and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] NZHC 2315
Parties
Applicant: Michelle Ashley Hing; Applicant: Sarah Jane Hing; Respondent: Linda Christine Hing (as trustee of the Linda Hing Family Trust)
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
4 September 2018
Procedural Posture
Application to Vest Land in Trustees Under S 52 Trustee Act 1956 and Part 19 High Court Rules / Decided on the Papers; Final Orders Made
Outcome
Application granted; final orders made vesting property in the continuing trustee and new trustees, leave granted and service dispensed with; costs to be met by the trust.
Legal Topics
Vesting of Trust Property, Trustee Removal and Appointment, Capacity and Enduring Power of Attorney, Dispensing With Service
Trusts Property Law Civil Procedure Vesting of Trust Property Trustee Removal and Appointment Capacity and Enduring Power of Attorney Dispensing With Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michelle Ashley Hing

Applicant

Sarah Jane Hing

Applicant

Linda Christine Hing (as trustee of the Linda Hing Family Trust)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to Vest Land in Trustees Under S 52 Trustee Act 1956 and Part 19 High Court Rules / Decided on the Papers; Final Orders Made

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to apply for orders vesting trust property in new trustees under s 52 Trustee Act 1956
  2. 2 Whether Linda should be removed as trustee because of incapacity and replaced by her daughters pursuant to enduring powers of attorney and the trust deed
  3. 3 Whether service of the proceeding could be dispensed with under the High Court Rules

Ratio Decidendi

Because Linda lacks capacity and the applicants possess authority under enduring powers of attorney and the trust deed to remove and appoint trustees, it was proper under s 52 Trustee Act 1956 and the High Court Rules to vest the trust property in the continuing trustee and the applicants, grant leave to apply and dispense with service so the trustees can deal with the property.

Court Disposition

Application granted; final orders made vesting property in the continuing trustee and new trustees, leave granted and service dispensed with; costs to be met by the trust.

Orders

  • Applicants granted leave to apply by originating application under r 19.5 of the High Court Rules 2016.
  • Under r 6.8 High Court Rules, service of the proceedings on the respondent or any other person is dispensed with.