ETG HOLDINGS LTD V FIRST EASTERN HOLDINGS LIMITED HC AK CIV-2012-404-000228
Threshold established: plaintiffs unlikely to be able to pay defendants' costs if unsuccessful given limited assets and contested valuation of shareholding; counterclaim and plaintiffs' causes are distinct enough not to preclude security; estimated defence costs ~NZD 90,000 and appropriate security set at three quarters; order for security for costs granted in the sum of NZD 67,500 payable by specified date with reserve for stay/dismissal if not provided.
- Citation
- openlaw-08b80cd0_365f_45a3_aa35_0d44f74b6ca2.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: ETG HOLDINGS LTD; Second Plaintiff: ETG BROKERAGE LIMITED; First Defendant: FIRST EASTERN HOLDINGS LIMITED; Second Defendant: FE INVESTMENTS LIMITED; Third Defendant: THATT KIONG SHIM
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contract and Fair Trading Act; Security for Costs Application / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Order for security for costs made in favour of defendants; defendants awarded costs of this application on a 2B basis with disbursements.
- Legal Topics
- Misrepresentation, Security for Costs, Counterclaim, Mitigation, Quantification of Costs, Contract Variation, Prospective Indemnity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ETG HOLDINGS LTD
First Plaintiff
ETG BROKERAGE LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
FIRST EASTERN HOLDINGS LIMITED
First Defendant
FE INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Second Defendant
THATT KIONG SHIM
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract and Fair Trading Act; Security for Costs Application / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs are likely unable to pay defendants' costs if defendants succeed (threshold for security for costs)
- 2 Whether the defendants' counterclaim arising from same facts precludes an order for security for costs
- 3 Appropriate quantum of security
Ratio Decidendi
Threshold established: plaintiffs unlikely to be able to pay defendants' costs if unsuccessful given limited assets and contested valuation of shareholding; counterclaim and plaintiffs' causes are distinct enough not to preclude security; estimated defence costs ~NZD 90,000 and appropriate security set at three quarters; order for security for costs granted in the sum of NZD 67,500 payable by specified date with reserve for stay/dismissal if not provided.
Court Disposition
Order for security for costs made in favour of defendants; defendants awarded costs of this application on a 2B basis with disbursements.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to provide security for costs in the sum of NZD 67,500 to the satisfaction of the Registrar by 20 December 2011
- If security is not provided by that date defendants have leave to apply to stay and/or dismiss the plaintiffs' claim against them
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment