NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTSʼ ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2016] NZSC 84

NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTSʼ ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2016] NZSC 84

Leave to appeal was granted because the question whether the Court of Appeal should have dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction warranted consideration by the Supreme Court; the Court found that the jurisdictional dismissal was a proper matter for the Supreme Court to hear on appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] NZSC 84
Parties
Applicant: New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association Incorporated; Respondent: Air New Zealand Limited
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
13 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal (leave to Appeal) / Leave to Appeal Granted
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Leave to Appeal, Court of Appeal Jurisdiction
Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Leave to Appeal Court of Appeal Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association Incorporated

Applicant

Air New Zealand Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (leave to Appeal) / Leave to Appeal Granted

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should have dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted because the question whether the Court of Appeal should have dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction warranted consideration by the Supreme Court; the Court found that the jurisdictional dismissal was a proper matter for the Supreme Court to hear on appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Approved question: should the Court of Appeal have dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction?