Application by Stables Family for Vesting Order [2016] NZHC 2519
The court applied s119(1) and granted the vesting order because the applicants demonstrated they had suffered loss as a result of the Official Assignee's disclaimer, the affected parties consented or did not oppose, and it was appropriate in the interests of justice to dispense with service; accordingly the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 2519
- Parties
- Applicant (trustee): Stables Family Trust (trustees: Jonathan Henry Stables; Nicola Stables; Joanne Rachel McLean); Applicant: Owen Joseph Stables; Applicant: Leone Henrietta Stables; Bankrupt / Respondent: Erin Owen Stables; Bankrupt / Respondent: Victoria Jillian Lambert; Interested Party / Crown Representative: Official Assignee; Interested Party (bona Vacantia Recipient): The Treasury; Mortgagee / Interested Party: Bank of New Zealand
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Vesting Order Under the Insolvency Act 2006 / Judgment on Without‑notice Application (on the Papers)
- Outcome
- Application allowed: vesting order granted under s119(1) of the Insolvency Act 2006; permission to commence by originating application granted; service dispensed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Order, Disclaimer of Property, Bona Vacantia, Service Dispensed, Equitable Distribution
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stables Family Trust (trustees: Jonathan Henry Stables; Nicola Stables; Joanne Rachel McLean)
Applicant (trustee)
Owen Joseph Stables
Applicant
Leone Henrietta Stables
Applicant
Erin Owen Stables
Bankrupt / Respondent
Victoria Jillian Lambert
Bankrupt / Respondent
Official Assignee
Interested Party / Crown Representative
The Treasury
Interested Party (bona Vacantia Recipient)
Bank of New Zealand
Mortgagee / Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Vesting Order Under the Insolvency Act 2006 / Judgment on Without‑notice Application (on the Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s119(1) of the Insolvency Act 2006 authorises vesting of a disclaimed interest in co‑owners who have suffered loss
- 2 Whether the court may dispense with service where affected parties consent or do not oppose
- 3 Whether the applicants have suffered loss or damage within s119(1)
Ratio Decidendi
The court applied s119(1) and granted the vesting order because the applicants demonstrated they had suffered loss as a result of the Official Assignee's disclaimer, the affected parties consented or did not oppose, and it was appropriate in the interests of justice to dispense with service; accordingly the disclaimed one‑third share was vested equally in the two remaining owner groups, resulting in each holding a one‑half share.
Court Disposition
Application allowed: vesting order granted under s119(1) of the Insolvency Act 2006; permission to commence by originating application granted; service dispensed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Permission granted for the applicants to commence proceedings by originating application.
- Service dispensed with on the Official Assignee, the Treasury, Bank of New Zealand, Erin Owen Stables and Victoria Jillian Lambert.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment