PAKI NIKORA ON BEHALF OF TE KAUNIHERA KAUMĀTUA O TŪHOE v TAMATI KRUGER ON BEHALF OF TŪHOE TE URU TAUMATUA TRUST [2023] NZSC 114

PAKI NIKORA ON BEHALF OF TE KAUNIHERA KAUMĀTUA O TŪHOE v TAMATI KRUGER ON BEHALF OF TŪHOE TE URU TAUMATUA TRUST [2023] NZSC 114

Leave to appeal was granted so the Supreme Court can determine whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent's appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] NZSC 114
Parties
Applicant: Paki Nikora on behalf of Te Kaunihera Kaumātua o Tūhoe; Respondent: Tamati Kruger on behalf of Tūhoe Te Uru Taumatua Trust
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
28 August 2023
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Leave Granted by Supreme Court
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Judicial Review of Appeals, Error of Law
Appeal Trusts Māori Law Procedural Law Leave to Appeal Judicial Review of Appeals Error of Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paki Nikora on behalf of Te Kaunihera Kaumātua o Tūhoe

Applicant

Tamati Kruger on behalf of Tūhoe Te Uru Taumatua Trust

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Leave Granted by Supreme Court

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent's appeal
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted so the Supreme Court can determine whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent's appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted
  • The approved question for the appeal is whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent's appeal