INTERNATIONAL PHOTO V PACIFIC MAGAZINES HC AK CIV-2011-404-00841
No binding agreement existed between the parties to bifurcate liability and quantum; notwithstanding plaintiffs' apparent election of damages, the Court exercised its discretion under r10.15 to order liability be tried separately from quantum because split trials best serve efficiency and proportionality in this complex case; accordingly defendants' demands for further particulars and discovery of damages-related material were declined pending determination of liability, plaintiffs were ordered to file affidavits identifying investigatory documents relevant to the defendants' affirmative defence and the defendants' particular discovery request regarding licensing arrangements was...
- Citation
- openlaw-d3312ed8_573c_4e9f_9f38_1262179a6bcc.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: International Photo Intellectual Property Limited; Second Plaintiff: Splash News & Picture Agency Inc; Third Plaintiff: BWP Media USA Inc; First Defendant: Pacific Magazines NZ Limited; Second Defendant: Pacific Magazines Pty Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders made: liability to be tried separately from quantum; mixed discovery orders; certain pleadings sealed; deed rectified.
- Legal Topics
- Parallel Importing, Exclusive Licensing, S 12(5 A)(a) Copyright Act 1994, Damages V Account of Profits, Particular Discovery, Litigation Privilege, Split Trials, Estoppel by Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
International Photo Intellectual Property Limited
First Plaintiff
Splash News & Picture Agency Inc
Second Plaintiff
BWP Media USA Inc
Third Plaintiff
Pacific Magazines NZ Limited
First Defendant
Pacific Magazines Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Copyright / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s 12(5A)(a) Copyright Act 1994 permits importation of Australian magazines into New Zealand without infringement
- 2 Whether IPIPL held exclusive New Zealand licensing rights and defendants breached contract/cl 3 of deed of settlement
- 3 Whether parties had agreed to split trials (liability first, quantum later) and could be held to that agreement
Ratio Decidendi
No binding agreement existed between the parties to bifurcate liability and quantum; notwithstanding plaintiffs' apparent election of damages, the Court exercised its discretion under r10.15 to order liability be tried separately from quantum because split trials best serve efficiency and proportionality in this complex case; accordingly defendants' demands for further particulars and discovery of damages-related material were declined pending determination of liability, plaintiffs were ordered to file affidavits identifying investigatory documents relevant to the defendants' affirmative defence and the defendants' particular discovery request regarding licensing arrangements was...
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders made: liability to be tried separately from quantum; mixed discovery orders; certain pleadings sealed; deed rectified.
Orders
- By consent the deed of settlement dated 23 July 2004 is rectified to record Pacific Magazines NZ Limited as the intended party to that deed.
- Until further order paragraphs 43, 61, 111 and 113 of the amended statement of claim dated 4 August 2011 and paragraph 19.8 of the plaintiffs' reply and defence dated 1 November 2011 are sealed and not available for search except by the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment