PAVANI ARUMALLA V SIVA KILARI CA CA240/2009

PAVANI ARUMALLA V SIVA KILARI CA CA240/2009

The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the writ of habeas corpus on the basis that the writ was not properly maintained and therefore required discharge.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
openlaw-3407a4a7_d36f_4ff7_a3df_fb8f67936872.pdf
Parties
Appellant: Pavani Arumalla; Respondent: Siva Kilari
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
7 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus Appeal / Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed; writ of habeas corpus set aside; parties granted leave to file a memorandum as to costs within seven days.
Legal Topics
Writ of Habeas Corpus, Custody, Costs
Habeas Corpus Criminal Procedure Appeals Writ of Habeas Corpus Custody Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pavani Arumalla

Appellant

Siva Kilari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus Appeal / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the writ of habeas corpus was properly issued
  2. 2 Whether the writ should be set aside on appeal
  3. 3 Entitlement to costs following disposition of habeas corpus proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the writ of habeas corpus on the basis that the writ was not properly maintained and therefore required discharge.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; writ of habeas corpus set aside; parties granted leave to file a memorandum as to costs within seven days.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed and the writ of habeas corpus is set aside.
  • The parties have leave to file a memorandum as to costs within seven days.