PEPPER NEW ZEALAND (CUSTODIANS) LIMITED V S TAKESH HC WANG CIV-2012-483-33
The plaintiff established that the defendant had no arguable defence and was entitled to vacant possession under s 137(1)(c) Property Law Act 2007; accordingly summary judgment was granted and orders for possession, substituted service and costs were made.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-327dedf4_888f_4efe_9eea_2ba8f77421a0.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff: PEPPER NEW ZEALAND (CUSTODIANS) LIMITED; Defendant: SALAHEDDIN TAKESH
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim Possession of Property / Summary Judgment (final Orders Made)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Vacant Possession, Summary Judgment, Substituted Service, Costs and Disbursements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PEPPER NEW ZEALAND (CUSTODIANS) LIMITED
Plaintiff
SALAHEDDIN TAKESH
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim Possession of Property / Summary Judgment (final Orders Made)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has any arguable defence to the plaintiff's claim
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to vacant possession under s 137(1)(c) Property Law Act 2007
- 3 Whether substituted service was properly effected
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff established that the defendant had no arguable defence and was entitled to vacant possession under s 137(1)(c) Property Law Act 2007; accordingly summary judgment was granted and orders for possession, substituted service and costs were made.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff
Orders
- Order pursuant to s 137(1)(c) Property Law Act 2007 requiring the defendant to give vacant possession of WN111/264 (77 Raine Street, Whanganui) and WN12C/339 (49 Harper Street, Whanganui) to the plaintiff within 14 days after service of the order
- Costs awarded to the plaintiff on a category 1A basis together with disbursements totalling $2,569.42
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
PEPPER NEW ZEALAND (CUSTODIANS) LIMITED V S TAKESH HC WANG CIV-2012-483-33 [11 July 2012]IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALANDWANGANUI REGISTRYCIV-2012-483-33[2012] NZHC 1658BETWEEN PEPPER NEW ZEALAND(CUSTODIANS) LIMITEDPlaintiffAND SALAHEDDIN TAKESHDefendantHearing: 11 July 2012(Heard at Wanganui (By Video Conference))Counsel: S. Little - Counsel for PlaintiffNo appearance for the defendantJudgment: 11 July 2012ORAL JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE D.I. GENDALLSolicitors: Gibson Sheat, Lawyers, Private Bag 31 905, Lower Hutt[1] Before the Court is an application by the plaintiff seeking summary judgment in this proceeding against the defendant.[2] Service of the substantive proceeding and summary judgment application in this matter on the defendant was completed by way of substituted service. Affidavits of service confirming this are before the Court.[3] The defendant has not filed any statement of defence in this proceeding norany Notice of Opposition to the plaintiff's summary judgment application. Nor wasthere any appearance by or for the defendant before me.[4] That said and having considered the plaintiff's statement of claim, supporting affidavit, Memorandum from counsel and the other material before the Court I take the view that the plaintiff has satisfied the Court that the defendant has no arguable defence to the claim made against him here.[5] That said, the plaintiff's summary judgment application here succeeds andthe following orders by way of summary judgment are now made:(a) An order is made pursuant to s 137(1)(c) Property Law Act 2007 requiring the defendant to give vacant possession of the properties described as WN111/264, Wellington Registry (77 Raine Street, Whanganui) and WN12C/339 Wellington Registry (49 Harper Street, Whanganui) to the plaintiff within 14 days after service of this order (which is to include service in accordance with the substituted service order I am to make shortly) or any other method of service allowed by the rules.(b) In addition, costs are awarded to the plaintiff against the defendant on this application on a category 1A basis together with disbursements as set out in the Memorandum filed by the plaintiff in this matter, those disbursements totalling $2,569.42.[6] As to service of this order on the defendant, a substituted service order is now made that the sealed order in this proceeding is to be served in the following manner by:(a) Leaving the order in the letterbox of the property at 7 Somme Parade, Wanganui marked to the attention of the defendant; and(b) Advertising the order once in an appropriate fashion in the Wanganui daily newspaper.[7] Leave is reserved to the plaintiff to approach the Court further if some clarification of the orders now made may be required.'Associate Judge D.I. Gendall'