JACKSON v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2022] NZHC 1059

JACKSON v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2022] NZHC 1059

As a party to the habeas corpus proceeding and being self-represented, the applicant is entitled under the Senior Courts (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 to inspect the electronic court file and to obtain copies of the documents contained therein; because the hearing was by teleconference and not recorded, no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] NZHC 1059
Parties
Applicant: Peter Donald Jackson; Respondent: Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
16 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Application Under Senior Courts (access to Documents) Rules 2017 Concerning Prior Habeas Corpus Proceeding / Judgment on Access Application (order to Disclose Court File Documents)
Outcome
Application granted in part; access to court file and copies ordered; no audio/transcript available
Legal Topics
Access to Court Records, Senior Courts (access to Documents) Rules 2017, Habeas Corpus, Self Representation
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Criminal Law Prisoners' Rights Access to Court Records Senior Courts (access to Documents) Rules 2017 Habeas Corpus Self Representation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Donald Jackson

Applicant

Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Senior Courts (access to Documents) Rules 2017 Concerning Prior Habeas Corpus Proceeding / Judgment on Access Application (order to Disclose Court File Documents)

  1. 1 Whether the applicant, as a party and self-represented litigant, is entitled to inspect and copy the court file under the Rules
  2. 2 Whether audio recordings or transcripts exist for a teleconference hearing
  3. 3 Scope of documents to be disclosed from the electronic court file

Ratio Decidendi

As a party to the habeas corpus proceeding and being self-represented, the applicant is entitled under the Senior Courts (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 to inspect the electronic court file and to obtain copies of the documents contained therein; because the hearing was by teleconference and not recorded, no audio file or transcript exists.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; access to court file and copies ordered; no audio/transcript available

Orders

  • Applicant is entitled to inspect and receive copies of the electronic court file relating to his October 2021 habeas corpus application
  • Registrar (or appropriate officer) is directed to make available and provide copies to the applicant of the documents in the electronic file