MORAHAN v WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 [2019] NZCA 425
On the basis of the joint memorandum of counsel and the Court's costs discretion, the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent costs in the sum of $25,875.40.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] NZCA 425
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter James Morahan; Respondent: Wellington Standards Committee 2
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Costs (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to respondent
- Legal Topics
- Costs Order, Professional Conduct, Disciplinary Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter James Morahan
Appellant
Wellington Standards Committee 2
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Costs (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be ordered to pay the respondent's costs
- 2 Appropriate quantum of costs
Ratio Decidendi
On the basis of the joint memorandum of counsel and the Court's costs discretion, the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent costs in the sum of $25,875.40.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to respondent
Orders
- The appellant is ordered to pay costs to the respondent in the sum of $25,875.40.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
MORAHAN v WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 [2019] NZCA 425 [11 September 2019]IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROACA392/2018[2019] NZCA 425BETWEEN PETER JAMES MORAHANAppellantAND WELLINGTON STANDARDSCOMMITTEE 2RespondentCourt: Collins, Peters and Mander JJCounsel: A C Beck for AppellantD R La Hood and S K Brennan for RespondentJudgment:(On the papers)11 September 2019 at 2.30 pmJUDGMENT OF THE COURTThe appellant is ordered to pay costs to the respondent in the sum of $25,875.40.____________________________________________________________________REASONS OF THE COURT(Given by Collins J)[1] We refer to the joint memorandum of counsel dated 14 August 2019.[2] The appellant is ordered to pay costs to the respondent in the sum of$25,875.40.Solicitors:Peter J Morahan, Lower Hutt for AppellantLuke Cunningham & Clere, Wellington for Respondent