HENSHAW v ANZ NATIONAL BANK LIMITED [2019] NZHC 3330
The application for approval of the proposal is adjourned because service of the application and meeting notice by email to two non‑responding creditors (and omission to notify a secured creditor) was not established as valid service, and because the trustee's report contains errors and unclear repayment calculations; the court indicates the proposal otherwise appears approvable but cannot finally approve until the trustee corrects the report and demonstrates valid service to all known creditors.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 3330
- Parties
- Insolvent: Ethan Angus Henshaw; Creditor: ANZ National Bank Limited; Creditor: Westpac New Zealand Limited; Creditor: Thorn Group Financial Services Limited; Creditor: American Express International (NZ) Inc; Creditor: Harmoney Limited; Creditor: Flexi Cards Limited; Creditor: Heartland Bank Limited; Creditor: Latitude Financial Services Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency / Application for Approval of Proposal; Interim Judgment; Adjourned to Address Service and Trustee's Report Issues
- Outcome
- Application adjourned to telephone conference on 12 February 2020 at 9:00am. Trustee ordered to correct report and prove valid service to all known creditors including the two non‑responding creditors and the secured creditor before approval will be considered.
- Legal Topics
- Proposal Approval, Service of Process, Trustee Duties, Creditors' Meeting, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ethan Angus Henshaw
Insolvent
ANZ National Bank Limited
Creditor
Westpac New Zealand Limited
Creditor
Thorn Group Financial Services Limited
Creditor
American Express International (NZ) Inc
Creditor
Harmoney Limited
Creditor
Flexi Cards Limited
Creditor
Heartland Bank Limited
Creditor
Latitude Financial Services Limited
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Insolvency / Application for Approval of Proposal; Interim Judgment; Adjourned to Address Service and Trustee's Report Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether notice by email satisfied statutory requirement to 'post' under s 330 of the Insolvency Act 2006 and whether notice of the s 333 application was validly served
- 2 Whether the trustee complied with s 333(1) by notifying all known creditors including secured creditors
- 3 Whether errors in the trustee's report (incorrect assets/liabilities and repayment calculations) undermine approval of the proposal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for approval of the proposal is adjourned because service of the application and meeting notice by email to two non‑responding creditors (and omission to notify a secured creditor) was not established as valid service, and because the trustee's report contains errors and unclear repayment calculations; the court indicates the proposal otherwise appears approvable but cannot finally approve until the trustee corrects the report and demonstrates valid service to all known creditors.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned to telephone conference on 12 February 2020 at 9:00am. Trustee ordered to correct report and prove valid service to all known creditors including the two non‑responding creditors and the secured creditor before approval will be considered.
Orders
- Application adjourned to a telephone conference at 9.00am on Wednesday 12 February 2020
- Counsel to file any submissions in respect of service and any evidence concerning the two creditors who did not vote and corrections to the trustee's report by Tuesday 4 February 2020 (five working days prior)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment