DAVID STEWART HENDERSON V THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE HC AK CIV-2009-404-004351
Adjournment denied and adjudication ordered: the court refused to halt the adjudication because of excessive delay (18+ months), significant public interest in prompt resolution and minimizing risk to third parties, prior statutory non-compliance in the first proposal, the slender and disputed margin by which the second proposal purportedly passed, likely further delay and prejudice to creditors; accordingly the court exercised its discretion to adjudicate the debtor bankrupt.
- Citation
- openlaw-edb01e7e_06af_4bf4_950c_7bd559f97670.pdf
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor/applicant: David Stewart Henderson; Judgment Creditor/respondent: Commissioner of Inland Revenue; Trustee/applicant: D J Ross; Supporting Creditor/respondent: Bank of Western Australia Ltd; Supporting Creditor/respondent: Downer Construction (New Zealand) Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application and Approval of a Debtor's Proposal Under the Insolvency Act 2006 / Interlocutory Hearing on Adjournment and Preliminary Questions; Court Dismissed Adjournment and Adjudicated Debtor Bankrupt
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment dismissed; order adjudicating David Stewart Henderson bankrupt made; costs awarded to Commissioner and supporting creditors
- Legal Topics
- Proposal Under Part 5, Adjournment of Adjudication, Creditor Voting Entitlement, Preliminary Questions on Threshold, Voidable Transactions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Stewart Henderson
Judgment Debtor/applicant
Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Judgment Creditor/respondent
D J Ross
Trustee/applicant
Bank of Western Australia Ltd
Supporting Creditor/respondent
Downer Construction (New Zealand) Ltd
Supporting Creditor/respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application and Approval of a Debtor's Proposal Under the Insolvency Act 2006 / Interlocutory Hearing on Adjournment and Preliminary Questions; Court Dismissed Adjournment and Adjudicated Debtor Bankrupt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should adjourn the creditor's application for adjudication to permit determination of a proposal under Part 5
- 2 Whether the debtor's proposal was accepted by the requisite majority (majority in number and three quarters in value)
- 3 Whether the court should determine a separate preliminary question on voting entitlements before full approval hearing
Ratio Decidendi
Adjournment denied and adjudication ordered: the court refused to halt the adjudication because of excessive delay (18+ months), significant public interest in prompt resolution and minimizing risk to third parties, prior statutory non-compliance in the first proposal, the slender and disputed margin by which the second proposal purportedly passed, likely further delay and prejudice to creditors; accordingly the court exercised its discretion to adjudicate the debtor bankrupt.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment dismissed; order adjudicating David Stewart Henderson bankrupt made; costs awarded to Commissioner and supporting creditors
Orders
- Application for adjournment dismissed
- David Stewart Henderson is adjudicated bankrupt
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment